login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (simplified)

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...>
Cc: <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Andi Kleen <ak@...>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>
Date: Sunday, November 18, 2007 - 7:11 pm

On Saturday 17 November 2007 01:03:35 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

Since immediate values are by definition an optimization, I think it makes
sense to insist they be 1, 2, 4 or 8 bytes.  A BUILD_BUG_ON() in the right
place should ensure this (probably in generic code rather than x86).


I don't think you need any modification to this file now.


This alignment is also now unnecessary.


This is now almost entirely generic code, but I suppose we can let the next
architecture hoist it out.


I think it would be easier to just fast-path the num_online_cpus == 1 case,
even if you want to keep this "update_early" interface.

But I like your IPI algorithm: very tight.

Thanks,
Rusty.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Nov 13, 2:58 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization, Rusty Russell, (Wed Nov 14, 11:08 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Thu Nov 15, 12:06 am)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization, Rusty Russell, (Thu Nov 15, 12:45 am)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Thu Nov 15, 1:37 am)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization, Rusty Russell, (Thu Nov 15, 7:06 am)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (simplif..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Fri Nov 16, 10:03 am)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (simplif..., Rusty Russell, (Sun Nov 18, 7:11 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (simplif..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Mon Nov 19, 3:15 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (simplif..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Mon Nov 19, 10:28 am)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (simplif..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Nov 20, 1:02 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Nov 13, 3:07 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Nov 13, 3:24 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Nov 13, 3:36 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Nov 13, 3:45 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Nov 13, 3:56 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (update), Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Nov 13, 4:40 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (update), Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Nov 13, 6:02 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (update), Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Nov 13, 8:34 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (update 2), Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Nov 13, 9:44 pm)
[PATCH] Immediate Values x86 Optimization Declare Discarded ..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Wed Nov 14, 2:52 pm)
[PATCH] Add __discard section to x86, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Wed Nov 14, 3:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Add __discard section to x86, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Nov 14, 3:33 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (update 2), Mathieu Desnoyers, (Wed Nov 14, 10:16 am)
speck-geostationary