Re: [patch] Printk kernel version in WARN_ON

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Saturday, November 17, 2007 - 6:04 pm

* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:


i agree we can clean this up - but this is a single-line thing that is 
very useful for QA so i think utility warrants .24 inclusion. The oops 
printouts are not generalized anyway.


x86 can skip stackframes via stacktrace.c.

	Ingo
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch] Printk kernel version in WARN_ON, Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Nov 17, 11:15 am)
Re: [patch] Printk kernel version in WARN_ON, Andrew Morton, (Sat Nov 17, 11:27 am)
Re: [patch] Printk kernel version in WARN_ON, Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Nov 17, 11:39 am)
Re: [patch] Printk kernel version in WARN_ON, Andrew Morton, (Sat Nov 17, 11:46 am)
Re: [patch] Printk kernel version in WARN_ON, Sam Ravnborg, (Sat Nov 17, 12:28 pm)
Re: [patch] Printk kernel version in WARN_ON, Sam Ravnborg, (Sat Nov 17, 12:42 pm)
Re: [patch] Printk kernel version in WARN_ON, Denys Vlasenko, (Sat Nov 17, 4:02 pm)
Re: [patch] Printk kernel version in WARN_ON, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Nov 17, 5:42 pm)
Re: [patch] Printk kernel version in WARN_ON, Andrew Morton, (Sat Nov 17, 5:57 pm)
Re: [patch] Printk kernel version in WARN_ON, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Nov 17, 6:04 pm)
Re: [patch] Printk kernel version in WARN_ON, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Nov 18, 10:18 am)
Re: [patch] Printk kernel version in WARN_ON, Pavel Machek, (Wed Nov 21, 5:51 am)