Re: [rfc-patch 07/11] Text Edit Lock - kprobes architecture independent support

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...>, <prasanna@...>, <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...>, <davem@...>
Date: Saturday, November 17, 2007 - 6:17 am

Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

isn't it better to put the kernel_text_lock around the for loop?


same question here


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[rfc-patch 07/11] Text Edit Lock - kprobes architecture inde..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Fri Nov 16, 3:57 pm)
Re: [rfc-patch 07/11] Text Edit Lock - kprobes architecture ..., Roel Kluin, (Sat Nov 17, 6:17 am)
Re: [rfc-patch 07/11] Text Edit Lock - kprobes architecture ..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Sat Nov 17, 11:02 am)