On Saturday, 17 of November 2007, Franck Bui-Huu wrote:
quoted text
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > However, using PF_NOFREEZE to prevent this from happening doesn't seem to be
> > a good idea.
> > 
> 
> Indeed but...
> 
> > I'd probably use wait_event_freezable() (defined in
> > include/linux/freezer.h) for that.
> 
> ...I would just revert this bits from now to make sure this driver
> work again for v2.6.24.

I'd prefer not to.

The PF_NOFREEZE was not present in 2.6.23 already and I wouldn't like to
reintroduce it now.

Why do you think that using wait_event_freezable() would not work, BTW?

quoted text
> > It tries to send them fake signals and waits for them to freeze.  If
> > they don't freeze within the timeout, it fails and clears their
> > TIF_FREEZE bits.
> 
> But send_fake_signal() seems to wake up task in INTERRUPTIBLE state
> only. Looking at signal_wake_up(), it basically do:
> 
> 	wake_up_state(t, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> 
> What am I missing ?

Nothing. :-)

I didn't remember the change that made the freezer use TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
explicitly in there (should have looked at the current code before replying).

Greetings,
Rafael
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/