Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:[.4, .5, .6 and .7 follows after .2 and .3] I've seen the bunch of patches posted for review - split to several series. But - out of curiocity - what's the reason to roll each series into each own stable release? Can't all .2...7 be combined into a single release (not counting .8 wich contains urgent security fixes)? (I mean, not with already rolled out stuff, but the original reasoning for split-releasing them (as opposed to split-reviewing)) Thanks. /mjt -
| Arjan van de Ven | [patch] Add basic sanity checks to the syscall execution patch |
| Matthew Wilcox | Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
git: | |
| Andy Whitcroft | Re: VCS comparison table |
| David | User's mailing list? And multiple cherry pick |
| Scott Chacon | Git Community Book |
| Mark Levedahl | Re: [PATCH] Teach remote machinery about remotes.default config variable |
| Marco Peereboom | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Tony Abernethy | Re: What is our ultimate goal?? |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| Denys Fedoryshchenko | packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169? |
| Radu Rendec | Endianness problem with u32 classifier hash masks |
