[RFC] PPC: add for_each_node_child() macro

Previous thread: [PATCH 3/3] security: allow capable check to permit mmap or low vm space by Eric Paris on Friday, November 16, 2007 - 4:55 pm. (7 messages)

Next thread: Is it possible to give the user the option to cancel forkbombs? by Martin Olsson on Saturday, November 17, 2007 - 1:51 am. (17 messages)
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Friday, November 16, 2007 - 5:10 pm

This patch adds usefull macro to iterate over a node childs.

Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
---
TODO: convert all for(...) cycles to this macro.

include/linux/of.h | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
index 5c39b92..a93e2aa 100644
--- a/include/linux/of.h
+++ b/include/linux/of.h
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle handle);
extern struct device_node *of_get_parent(const struct device_node *node);
extern struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
struct device_node *prev);
+#define for_each_node_child(dn, child) \
+ for (child = NULL; (child = of_get_next_child(dn, child)); )
extern struct property *of_find_property(const struct device_node *np,
const char *name,
int *lenp);

-

Previous thread: [PATCH 3/3] security: allow capable check to permit mmap or low vm space by Eric Paris on Friday, November 16, 2007 - 4:55 pm. (7 messages)

Next thread: Is it possible to give the user the option to cancel forkbombs? by Martin Olsson on Saturday, November 17, 2007 - 1:51 am. (17 messages)