On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:57:28AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
quoted text
> This patch (as1013) was suggested by David Woodhouse; it fixes a race
> in the driver core.  If a device is unregistered at the same time as
> its driver is unloaded, the driver's code pages may be unmapped while
> the remove method is still running.  The calls to get_driver() and
> put_driver() were intended to prevent this, but they don't work if the
> driver's module count has already dropped to 0.
> 
> Instead, the patch keeps the device on the driver's list until after
> the remove method has returned.  This forces the necessary
> synchronization to occur.

Is this something that you all feel is worth getting in for 2.6.24?
Does it fix a regression that just showed up, or is just a bugfix for
something that people finally realized has always been there?

Can it wait for 2.6.25 to get some more testing in -mm?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/