Re: [PATCHv2 4/4] first use of sys_indirect system call

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ulrich Drepper
Date: Friday, November 16, 2007 - 11:59 am

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

dean gaudet wrote:

No, the global flag is hardly ever useful.  You almost never know the
details of all the libraries you link to well enough to determine that
they don't need FD_CLOEXEC disabled.  Even more problematic, you cannot
know whether they will need it in future.

For applications the solution is simple: wrap to appropriate calls.
Apache has all these apr_ wrappers.  But them to some good news after all.

- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHPeim2ijCOnn/RHQRAu8xAJsF/0Ir1PWMbHkVRaI5vKOGFS4tMACfVEs9
pMYAiCAU1E2B+7QR0EP+/F8=
=btt9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCHv2 4/4] first use of sys_indirect system call, Ulrich Drepper, (Thu Nov 15, 11:22 am)
Re: [PATCHv2 4/4] first use of sys_indirect system call, Eric Dumazet, (Thu Nov 15, 7:57 pm)
Re: [PATCHv2 4/4] first use of sys_indirect system call, dean gaudet, (Fri Nov 16, 11:08 am)
Re: [PATCHv2 4/4] first use of sys_indirect system call, Ulrich Drepper, (Fri Nov 16, 11:19 am)
Re: [PATCHv2 4/4] first use of sys_indirect system call, dean gaudet, (Fri Nov 16, 11:22 am)
Re: [PATCHv2 4/4] first use of sys_indirect system call, Ulrich Drepper, (Fri Nov 16, 11:59 am)