Linus Torvalds wrote:On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 02:42:46PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: There may be bigger fish to fry in terms of per-process overhead, if you're trying to cut that down. The trouble with trying to address some of those is that there is mutual antagonism between compactness and expansibility in the process address space layout, so you'll end up instantiating a lot more than you want barring some sort of provision for a compact address space layout. Pagetable sharing is a far more powerful resource scalability method, though it also needs cooperation in user address space layout to reap its gains. There are other overheads, of course, though they're more typically per-something besides processes. -- wli -
| Greg KH | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| Greg KH | [patch 26/73] NET: Correct two mistaken skb_reset_mac_header() conversions. |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 007/196] Chinese: add translation of stable_kernel_rules.txt |
| Alan Cox | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
