Re: [PATCH 0/4] sys_indirect system call

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <akpm@...>, <torvalds@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Date: Thursday, November 15, 2007 - 6:19 pm

Ulrich Drepper wrote:

I might quarrel with some details, but I really like the general notion.

I think we can use this to pass per-syscall syslet data to the
scheduler.  Today the patches have submission syscalls which basically
wrap some data for the scheduler around the syscall ABI.  This might
save the syslet patches from needing to know about each arch's ABI.

We'll see.  I'll give it a try.

- z
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/4] sys_indirect system call, Ulrich Drepper, (Thu Nov 15, 12:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/4] sys_indirect system call, Zach Brown, (Thu Nov 15, 6:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/4] sys_indirect system call, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Nov 15, 6:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/4] sys_indirect system call, Ulrich Drepper, (Sat Nov 17, 5:14 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/4] sys_indirect system call, Ulrich Drepper, (Thu Nov 15, 7:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/4] sys_indirect system call, Zach Brown, (Thu Nov 15, 7:40 pm)