> This code is far to be perfect, some part is outdated, bcopy() use insteadng <disclaimer> I'm not a kernel developer. </disclaimer> That having said: I really do like such obvious (as in: for those knowing the stuff anyway) comments when looking at code and probably concepts I'm not familiar with. IMO there is no need to belittle this type of comment. IMO any casual reader not familiar with the whole set of functions possibly involved will be thankful for this type of comment - I certainly am. Yes. And ? =46WIW whenever I tried to look at kernel code I'm usually facing the decision to =2D either give up trying to understand what is intended or =2D do a thorough search to learn everything required I usually give up due to time constraints. I mean, isn't the whole purpose of comments to help those not familiar with the code to understand it's purpose and possibly the intention of the author (just in case the author had coded a bug) ? =46rom my PoV this establishes a steep learning curve for "outsiders" to start working on the kernel. [just in case: don't give me anything along the line "this is an inherent test as to the fitness of the potential hacker" ;] Just my thoughts, Michael =2D-=20 Vote against SPAM - see http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ Michael Gerdau email: mgerdau@tiscali.de GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Bart Van Assche | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Badalian Vyacheslav | e1000: Question about polling |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
