Re: [PATCH] ata_sg_setup_one vs ata_sg_setup?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, November 15, 2007 - 8:36 am

On Thursday 15 November 2007 15:08:00 Tejun Heo wrote:

Great, thanks for the feedback.  I'd guess mine is more likely missing 
something than yours though...

Cheers,
Rusty.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] ata_sg_setup_one vs ata_sg_setup?, Rusty Russell, (Wed Nov 14, 12:40 am)
Re: [PATCH] ata_sg_setup_one vs ata_sg_setup?, Tejun Heo, (Thu Nov 15, 12:08 am)
Re: [PATCH] ata_sg_setup_one vs ata_sg_setup?, Rusty Russell, (Thu Nov 15, 8:36 am)
Re: [PATCH] ata_sg_setup_one vs ata_sg_setup?, Boaz Harrosh, (Wed Nov 14, 8:25 am)