that did the trick! Nick, find an updated patch below. (reference to the
bugzilla added.)
Ingo
-------------------->
Subject: slob: fix memory corruption
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Previously, it would be possible for prev->next to point to
&free_slob_pages, and thus we would try to move a list onto itself, and
bad things would happen.
It seems a bit hairy to be doing list operations with the list marker as
an entry, rather than a head, but...
this resolves the following crash:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9379
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
mm/slob.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux/mm/slob.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/mm/slob.c
+++ linux/mm/slob.c
@@ -321,7 +321,8 @@ static void *slob_alloc(size_t size, gfp
/* Improve fragment distribution and reduce our average
* search time by starting our next search here. (see
* Knuth vol 1, sec 2.5, pg 449) */
- if (free_slob_pages.next != prev->next)
+ if (prev != free_slob_pages.prev &&
+ free_slob_pages.next != prev->next)
list_move_tail(&free_slob_pages, prev->next);
break;
}
-