login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
November
»
14
Re: [PATCH] Add __discard section to x86
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...>
Cc: <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Andi Kleen <ak@...>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] Add __discard section to x86
Date: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 - 3:33 pm
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
quoted text
> Add a __discard sectionto the linker script. Code produced in this section will > not be put in the vmlinux file. This is useful when we have to calculate the > size of an instruction before actually declaring it (for alignment purposes for > instance). This is used by the immediate values. > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> > CC: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> > CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> > CC: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> > CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> > CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> > CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Tue Nov 13, 2:58 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
, Rusty Russell
, (Wed Nov 14, 11:08 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Thu Nov 15, 12:06 am)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
, Rusty Russell
, (Thu Nov 15, 12:45 am)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Thu Nov 15, 1:37 am)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
, Rusty Russell
, (Thu Nov 15, 7:06 am)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (simplif...
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Fri Nov 16, 10:03 am)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (simplif...
, Rusty Russell
, (Sun Nov 18, 7:11 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (simplif...
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Mon Nov 19, 3:15 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (simplif...
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Mon Nov 19, 10:28 am)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (simplif...
, Rusty Russell
, (Mon Nov 19, 7:06 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (simplif...
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Tue Nov 20, 1:02 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Tue Nov 13, 3:07 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Tue Nov 13, 3:24 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Tue Nov 13, 3:36 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Tue Nov 13, 3:45 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Tue Nov 13, 3:56 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (update)
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Tue Nov 13, 4:40 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (update)
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Tue Nov 13, 5:26 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (update)
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Tue Nov 13, 6:02 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (update)
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Tue Nov 13, 6:35 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (update)
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Tue Nov 13, 8:34 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (update)
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Tue Nov 13, 9:02 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (update 2)
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Tue Nov 13, 9:44 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (update 2)
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Tue Nov 13, 10:58 pm)
[PATCH] Immediate Values x86 Optimization Declare Discarded ...
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Wed Nov 14, 2:52 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Immediate Values x86 Optimization Declare Discar...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Wed Nov 14, 3:00 pm)
[PATCH] Add __discard section to x86
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Wed Nov 14, 3:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Add __discard section to x86
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Wed Nov 14, 3:33 pm)
Re: [patch 5/8] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (update 2)
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Wed Nov 14, 10:16 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Andrew Morton
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Rafael J. Wysocki
[Bug #11806] iwl3945 fails with microcode error
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
Andrew Morton
-mm merge plans for 2.6.23
git
:
openbsd-misc
:
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
David Miller
Re: [GIT]: Networking
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Jeff Kirsher
[RESEND NET-NEXT PATCH 08/20] igb: Introduce multiple TX queues with infrastructure
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
0 users
and
812 guests
online.
Syndicate