On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:18:05 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:that's.. not automatic; it depends on what the right thing is :-( What for sure changes is that who gets to do IO changes. Some of the tests we ran internally (we didn't publish yet because we saw REALLY large variations for most of them even without any patch) show for example that "dbench" got slower. But.. dbench gets slower when things get more fair, and faster when things get unfair. What conclusion you draw out of that is a whole different matter and depends on exactly what the test is doing, and what is the right thing for the OS to do in terms of who gets to do the IO. THis makes the patch more tricky than the one line change suggests, and this is also why I haven't published a ton of data yet; it's hard to get useful tests for this (and the variation of the 2.6.23+ kernels makes it even harder to do anything meaningful ;-( ) -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -
| Jeff Garzik | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Christoph Hellwig | Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scan... |
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jens Axboe | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Emmanuel Dreyfus | fixing send(2) semantics (kern/29750) |
| Christos Zoulas | Re: Melting down your network [Subject changed] |
| Juan RP | Changing the I/O scheduler on-the-fly |
| Emmanuel Dreyfus | Re: fixing send(2) semantics (kern/29750) |
