On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:43:02PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:I've done this a gazillion times before, so maybe instead of beeing a lazy bastard you could look up mailinglist archive. It's not like this is the first discussion of perfmon. But to get start look at the systems calls, many of them are beasts like: int pfm_read_pmds(int fd, pfarg_pmd_t *pmds, int n) This is basically a read(2) (or for other syscalls a write) on something else than the file descriptor provided to the system call. The right thing to do is obviously have a pmds and pmcs file in procfs for the thread beeing monitored instead of these special-case files, with another set for global tracing. Similarly I'm pretty sure we can get a much better interface if we introduce marching files in procfs for the other calls. -
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Eric W. Biederman | [PATCH 0/10] sysfs network namespace support |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
