From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:55:07 +0000I created a mailing list on a machine where I provide such services. People can choose to use or not use the new list, it is their choice. I didn't tell you to take your list down or to run it in some other way. I didn't tell you to unsubscribe everyone and move them over to the new list either. I've provided an alternative, and people can pick and choose how they see fit. I'm letting natural selection run it's course. Are you able to cope with the fact that people might not want to use your list any longer? Perhaps that is what bugs you so much about my giving people a alternative choice. The operative term is "alternative" rather than "replacement". Perhaps this misunderstanding is what you're so upset about. And yes, that alsa list bugs the crap out of me too. I'm more than happy to provide an alternative for that one as well. In fact, *poof*, there it is, linux-alsa@vger.kernel.org is there and available for anyone who wants to use it. Have a nice day Russell. -
| Eric Sandeen | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 007/196] Chinese: add translation of stable_kernel_rules.txt |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
