Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Brownell <david-b@...>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...>, Felipe Balbi <felipebalbi@...>, Bill Gatliff <bgat@...>, Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...>, Andrew Victor <andrew@...>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...>, Jean Delvare <khali@...>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...>, Paul Mundt <lethal@...>, Ben Dooks <ben@...>
Date: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 - 9:04 pm

Subject: [PATCH 5/5] move per GPIO "requested" to "struct gpio_desc"

---
 include/asm-generic/gpio.h |   17 +++---------
 lib/gpiolib.c              |   62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h b/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
index da67038..7e70c67 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
@@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ struct gpio_chip;
 struct gpio_desc {
 	struct gpio_chip *chip;
 	unsigned is_out:1;
+	unsigned requested:1;
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
+	const char *requested_str;
+#endif
 };

 /**
@@ -76,24 +80,11 @@ struct gpio_chip {
 	u16			ngpio;
 	unsigned		can_sleep:1;

-	/* other fields are modified by the gpio library only */
-	DECLARE_BITMAP(requested, ARCH_GPIOS_PER_CHIP);
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
 	struct list_head	node;
-	const char		*requested_str[ARCH_GPIOS_PER_CHIP];
 #endif
 };

-/* returns true iff a given gpio signal has been requested;
- * primarily for code dumping gpio_chip state.
- */
-static inline int
-gpiochip_is_requested(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
-{
-	return test_bit(offset, chip->requested);
-}
-
 /* add/remove chips */
 extern int gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip);
 extern int __must_check gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip);
diff --git a/lib/gpiolib.c b/lib/gpiolib.c
index a089597..f9e1c88 100644
--- a/lib/gpiolib.c
+++ b/lib/gpiolib.c
@@ -43,20 +43,19 @@ static inline int gpio_is_onchip(unsigned gpio,
struct gpio_chip *chip)
 /* Warn when drivers omit gpio_request() calls -- legal but
  * ill-advised when setting direction, and otherwise illegal.
  */
-static void gpio_ensure_requested(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
+static void gpio_ensure_requested(unsigned gpio)
 {
-	int		requested;
+	int requested;

-	requested = test_and_set_bit(offset, chip->requested);
+	requested = gpio_desc[gpio].requested;

 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
 	if (!requested)
-		chip->requested_str[offset] = "(auto)";
+		gpio_desc[gpio].requested_str = "(auto)";
 #endif

 	if (!requested)
-		printk(KERN_DEBUG "GPIO-%d autorequested\n",
-				chip->base + offset);
+		pr_debug("GPIO-%d autorequested\n", gpio);
 }

 /* caller holds gpio_lock */
@@ -114,13 +113,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_add);
 int gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 {
 	unsigned long	flags;
-	int		offset;
 	unsigned	id;

 	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);

-	for (offset = 0; offset < chip->ngpio; offset++)
-		if (gpiochip_is_requested(chip, offset)) {
+	for (id = chip->base; id < chip->base + chip->ngpio; id++)
+		if (gpio_desc[id].requested) {
 			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
 			return -EBUSY;
 		}
@@ -145,11 +143,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_remove);
 int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label)
 {
 	struct gpio_chip	*chip;
+	struct gpio_desc	*desc;
 	int			status = -EINVAL;
 	unsigned long		flags;

 	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
-	chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
+
+	desc = &gpio_desc[gpio];
+	chip = desc->chip;

 	if (!gpio_is_onchip(gpio, chip))
 		goto done;
@@ -162,12 +163,14 @@ int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label)

 	status = 0;

-	if (test_and_set_bit(gpio, chip->requested))
+	if (desc->requested == 0)
+		desc->requested = 1;
+	else
 		status = -EBUSY;

 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
 	if (status == 0)
-		chip->requested_str[gpio] = (label == NULL) ? "?" : label;
+		desc->requested_str = (label == NULL) ? "?" : label;
 #endif

 done:
@@ -180,9 +183,11 @@ void gpio_free(unsigned gpio)
 {
 	unsigned long		flags;
 	struct gpio_chip	*chip;
+	struct gpio_desc	*desc;

 	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);

+	desc = &gpio_desc[gpio];
 	chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio);

 	if (!gpio_is_onchip(gpio, chip))
@@ -190,12 +195,13 @@ void gpio_free(unsigned gpio)

 	gpio -= chip->base;

-	if (!test_and_clear_bit(gpio, chip->requested))
+	if (desc->requested == 0)
+		desc->requested = 1;
+	else
 		chip = NULL;

 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
-	if (chip != NULL)
-		chip->requested_str[gpio] = NULL;
+	desc->requested_str = NULL;
 #endif
 	WARN_ON(extra_checks && chip == NULL);
 done:
@@ -231,8 +237,8 @@ int gpio_direction_input(unsigned gpio)
 	if (!gpio_is_onchip(gpio, chip))
 		goto fail;

+	gpio_ensure_requested(gpio);
 	gpio -= chip->base;
-	gpio_ensure_requested(chip, gpio);

 	/* now we know the gpio is valid and chip won't vanish */

@@ -267,8 +273,8 @@ int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value)
 	if (!gpio_is_onchip(gpio, chip))
 		goto fail;

+	gpio_ensure_requested(gpio);
 	gpio -= chip->base;
-	gpio_ensure_requested(chip, gpio);

 	/* now we know the gpio is valid and chip won't vanish */

@@ -304,7 +310,7 @@ int __gpio_get_value(unsigned gpio)
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
 	chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
 	if (extra_checks)
-		gpio_ensure_requested(chip, gpio - chip->base);
+		gpio_ensure_requested(gpio);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);

 	if (unlikely(chip->can_sleep)) {
@@ -323,7 +329,7 @@ void __gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
 	chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
 	if (extra_checks)
-		gpio_ensure_requested(chip, gpio - chip->base);
+		gpio_ensure_requested(gpio);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);

 	if (unlikely(chip->can_sleep))
@@ -341,7 +347,7 @@ int __gpio_cansleep(unsigned gpio)
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
 	chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
 	if (extra_checks)
-		gpio_ensure_requested(chip, gpio - chip->base);
+		gpio_ensure_requested(gpio);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
 	return chip->can_sleep;
 }
@@ -363,7 +369,7 @@ int gpio_get_value_cansleep(unsigned gpio)
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
 	chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
 	if (extra_checks)
-		gpio_ensure_requested(chip, gpio - chip->base);
+		gpio_ensure_requested(gpio);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);

 	return chip->get(chip, gpio - chip->base);
@@ -380,7 +386,7 @@ void gpio_set_value_cansleep(unsigned gpio, int value)
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
 	chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
 	if (extra_checks)
-		gpio_ensure_requested(chip, gpio - chip->base);
+		gpio_ensure_requested(gpio);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);

 	chip->set(chip, gpio - chip->base, value);
@@ -401,21 +407,23 @@ static void gpiolib_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s,
struct gpio_chip *chip)
 	for (i = 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++) {
 		unsigned	gpio;
 		int		is_out;
+		struct gpio_desc *desc;

-		if (!chip->requested_str[i])
+		if (!desc->requested)
 			continue;

 		gpio = chip->base + i;
-		is_out = gpio_desc[gpio].is_out;
+		desc = &gpio_desc[gpio];
+		is_out = desc->is_out;

 		seq_printf(s, " gpio-%-3d (%-12s) %s %s",
-			gpio, chip->requested_str[i],
-			is_out ? "out" : "in ",
+			gpio, desc->requested_str,
+			desc->is_out ? "out" : "in ",
 			chip->get
 				? (chip->get(chip, i) ? "hi" : "lo")
 				: "?  ");

-		if (!is_out) {
+		if (!desc->is_out) {
 			int		irq = gpio_to_irq(gpio);
 			struct irq_desc	*desc = irq_desc + irq;

-- 
1.5.2.5.GIT
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, David Brownell, (Mon Oct 29, 9:51 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, David Brownell, (Mon Nov 5, 5:05 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, eric miao, (Mon Nov 12, 10:28 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, David Brownell, (Tue Nov 13, 3:06 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, eric miao, (Tue Nov 13, 8:57 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, David Brownell, (Tue Nov 13, 11:30 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, eric miao, (Wed Nov 14, 2:40 am)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, David Brownell, (Wed Nov 14, 3:08 am)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, David Brownell, (Mon Nov 26, 9:46 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, eric miao, (Tue Nov 27, 6:58 am)
[patch/rfc 2.6.24-rc3-mm] gpiolib grows a gpio_desc, David Brownell, (Tue Nov 27, 11:15 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.24-rc3-mm] gpiolib grows a gpio_desc, David Brownell, (Wed Nov 28, 5:53 am)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, David Brownell, (Tue Nov 27, 3:29 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, eric miao, (Wed Nov 28, 1:11 am)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, David Brownell, (Tue Nov 27, 3:03 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, David Brownell, (Tue Nov 27, 1:26 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, eric miao, (Tue Nov 13, 9:00 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, David Brownell, (Tue Nov 13, 11:25 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, eric miao, (Wed Nov 14, 2:37 am)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, David Brownell, (Tue Nov 13, 11:53 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, eric miao, (Tue Nov 13, 9:02 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, David Brownell, (Tue Nov 13, 11:28 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, eric miao, (Tue Nov 13, 9:03 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, David Brownell, (Wed Nov 14, 12:18 am)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, eric miao, (Wed Nov 14, 2:46 am)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, eric miao, (Tue Nov 13, 9:04 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, eric miao, (Tue Nov 13, 9:04 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, David Brownell, (Wed Nov 14, 12:36 am)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, Jean Delvare, (Sat Nov 17, 6:38 am)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, David Brownell, (Sat Nov 17, 1:36 pm)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, Jean Delvare, (Tue Nov 20, 11:20 am)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, eric miao, (Wed Nov 14, 2:51 am)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, David Brownell, (Wed Nov 14, 3:19 am)
Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework, eric miao, (Wed Nov 14, 3:36 am)