Re: 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 - 7:44 am

On Tuesday 13 November 2007 07:13, Matt Mackall wrote:

Actually I did test slob as well -- it's competitive with slab and
slub up to about 4 cores, which is nice.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers, Nick Piggin, (Fri Nov 9, 8:36 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers, Matt Mackall, (Mon Nov 12, 4:13 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers, Nick Piggin, (Tue Nov 13, 7:44 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Nov 9, 11:15 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Nov 9, 1:49 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc2: Network commit causes SLUB performance regre..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Nov 12, 3:44 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc2: Network commit causes SLUB performance regre..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Nov 14, 9:03 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc2: Network commit causes SLUB performance regre..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Nov 14, 2:33 pm)