Hi Alexander,
Although the following non-idiomatic and quite cumbersome C language construct
label:
if (condition) {
// DO HARD WORK
goto label;
}
is equivalent to a simple while loop
while (condition) {
// DO HARD WORK
}
it was the "label-if-goto label" approach chosen to implement the loop in the mntput_no_expire() routine located in `fs/namespace.c'.
The patch enclosed to this message changes the goto-based loop to a while-based one, not only saving us two lines of code, but also making the implementation idiomatic and thus more readable.
Thanks,
Dmitri
Signed-off-by: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com>
--
diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index 0608388..6a0cee1 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -278,8 +278,7 @@ static inline void __mntput(struct vfsmo
void mntput_no_expire(struct vfsmount *mnt)
{
-repeat:
- if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&mnt->mnt_count, &vfsmount_lock)) {
+ while (atomic_dec_and_lock(&mnt->mnt_count, &vfsmount_lock)) {
if (likely(!mnt->mnt_pinned)) {
spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
__mntput(mnt);
@@ -290,7 +289,6 @@ repeat:
spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
acct_auto_close_mnt(mnt);
security_sb_umount_close(mnt);
- goto repeat;
}
}
-
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Matheos Worku | 2.6.24 BUG: soft lockup - CPU#X |
