On Tuesday 13 November 2007 00:52:14 Christoph Lameter wrote:
quoted text
> Use sparsemem as the only memory model for UP, SMP and NUMA.
> 
> Measurements indicate that DISCONTIGMEM has a higher
> overhead than sparsemem. And FLATMEMs benefits are minimal. So I think its
> best to simply standardize on sparsemem.

How about the memory overhead? Is it the same too?
And code size vs flatmem?

-Andi
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/