login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
November
»
12
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
David Miller <davem@...>
To: <dada1@...>
Cc: <tony.luck@...>, <clameter@...>, <herbert@...>, <akpm@...>, <linux-arch@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <mathieu.desnoyers@...>, <penberg@...>
Subject:
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
Date: Monday, November 12, 2007 - 6:46 pm
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:14:47 +0100
quoted text
> I dont think this is a problem. Cpus numbers and ram size are related, even if > Moore didnt predicted it; > > Nobody wants to ship/build a 4096 cpus machine with 256 MB of ram inside. > Or call it a GPU and dont expect it to run linux :) > > 99,9% of linux machines running on earth have less than 8 cpus and less than > 1000 ethernet/network devices. > > In case we increase the number of cpus on a machine, the limiting factor is > the fact that cpus have to continually exchange on memory bus those highly > touched cache lines that contain refcounters or stats.
I totally agree with everything Eric is saying here. -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cp...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Wed Oct 31, 8:02 pm)
[PATCH 1/7] One less parameter to __d_path
, Jan Blunck
, (Mon Oct 29, 8:41 am)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Eric Dumazet
, (Thu Nov 1, 3:17 am)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Nov 1, 8:57 am)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Thu Nov 1, 5:28 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Nov 1, 6:11 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Thu Nov 1, 6:14 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Nov 1, 6:16 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Thu Nov 1, 3:57 am)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Nov 1, 9:01 am)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Thu Nov 1, 5:25 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Wed Oct 31, 8:24 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Wed Oct 31, 8:26 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Wed Oct 31, 8:27 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Wed Oct 31, 8:31 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Wed Oct 31, 8:51 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Wed Oct 31, 8:53 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Wed Oct 31, 9:00 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Wed Oct 31, 9:01 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Wed Oct 31, 9:09 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Wed Oct 31, 9:12 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Wed Oct 31, 9:13 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Nov 1, 12:16 am)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Thu Nov 1, 3:01 am)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Thu Nov 1, 5:14 am)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Nov 1, 9:03 am)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Thu Nov 1, 5:29 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Nov 1, 6:15 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Thu Nov 1, 6:38 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Nov 1, 6:48 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Eric Dumazet
, (Thu Nov 1, 7:00 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Nov 1, 9:40 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Nov 1, 8:58 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Thu Nov 1, 6:58 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Herbert Xu
, (Mon Nov 12, 6:52 am)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Mon Nov 12, 5:28 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Mon Nov 12, 3:14 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Eric Dumazet
, (Mon Nov 12, 3:48 pm)
RE: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Luck, Tony
, (Mon Nov 12, 3:57 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Eric Dumazet
, (Mon Nov 12, 4:14 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Mon Nov 12, 6:46 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Mon Nov 12, 3:56 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Eric Dumazet
, (Mon Nov 12, 4:18 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Mon Nov 12, 6:46 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Fri Nov 2, 6:28 am)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Nov 2, 10:35 am)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Fri Nov 2, 11:20 am)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Nov 2, 11:29 am)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Nov 1, 9:06 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Thu Nov 1, 10:51 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Thu Nov 1, 1:38 am)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Wed Oct 31, 9:21 pm)
Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe...
, David Miller
, (Thu Nov 1, 1:27 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
david
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Greg KH
[2.6.22.2 review 05/84] Fix deadlocks in sparc serial console.
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
Andrew Morton
-mm merge plans for 2.6.23
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Jeff Kirsher
[RESEND][NET-NEXT PATCH 01/29] ixgbe: fix bug where using wake queue instead of st...
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Patrick McHardy
Re: [GIT]: Networking
netbsd-tech-kern
:
Manuel Bouyer
Re: Interactive performance in -current
Christian Limpach
Re: newfs: determining file system parameters
YAMAMOTO Takashi
Re: statvfs(2) replacement for statfs(2) patch
Charles M. Hannum
Re: kern/22869: Slave IDE drive not detected
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
2 users
and
1073 guests
online.
Online users
ernestot1
plasmavslcd
Syndicate