Re: Module init call vs symbols exporting race?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...>
Cc: Jon Masters <jonathan@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...>, Andi Kleen <andi@...>
Date: Monday, November 12, 2007 - 10:03 am

On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 18:27 +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:

If we fail since we have to in the "dependency isn't ready" case then
the warning seems quite useless. I'll send a patch in a seperate mail
to remove the warning.

-jang

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Module init call vs symbols exporting race?, Pavel Emelyanov, (Tue Nov 6, 5:20 am)
Re: Module init call vs symbols exporting race?, Rusty Russell, (Tue Nov 6, 8:41 am)
Re: Module init call vs symbols exporting race?, Jan Glauber, (Wed Nov 7, 6:01 am)
Re: Module init call vs symbols exporting race?, Andi Kleen, (Sat Nov 10, 4:23 pm)
Re: Module init call vs symbols exporting race?, Rusty Russell, (Wed Nov 7, 10:10 pm)
Re: Module init call vs symbols exporting race?, Jan Glauber, (Fri Nov 9, 12:06 pm)
Re: Module init call vs symbols exporting race?, Jon Masters, (Fri Nov 9, 7:44 am)
Re: Module init call vs symbols exporting race?, Jan Glauber, (Fri Nov 9, 8:16 am)
Re: Module init call vs symbols exporting race?, Rusty Russell, (Sat Nov 10, 3:27 am)
Re: Module init call vs symbols exporting race?, Jan Glauber, (Mon Nov 12, 10:03 am)