Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> writes:

quoted text
> Hello.
>
> Thanks for reformatting my patch
> and sorry for surprising you with directory name
> (I meant to type linux-2.6.24-rc2, not linux-2.6.22-rc2).
>
> According to linux-2.6.23,
> it seems that I should return -ENOTDIR
> for invalid args->nlen value.
>
> I got a question here regarding interpretation of CTL_MAXNAME .
> Is args->nlen == CTL_MAXNAME valid?
> It is treated as invalid while the definition says
>
>   /* how many path components do we allow in a
>      call to sysctl?   In other words, what is
>      the largest acceptable value for the nlen
>      member of a struct __sysctl_args to have? */
>
> If "name[CTL_MAXNAME];" is what the author intended,
> I think args->nlen == CTL_MAXNAME is valid.

name[CTL_MAXNAME} is not valid.
name[0...CTL_MAXNAME-1] is valid.


The check that got lost in the refactoring was specfically:

-       if (tmp.nlen <= 0 || tmp.nlen >= CTL_MAXNAME)
-               return -ENOTDIR;

Eric

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/