Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser(2)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@...>, <akpm@...>, <torvalds@...>, <linux-security-module@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Al Viro <viro@...>
Date: Sunday, November 11, 2007 - 2:37 pm

Hi Pavel,

On Nov 11, 2007 2:44 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:

Thanks for your care about this. It seems not a lot of people have
noticed, but to stop any objections not related to the core smack
code, Casey decided to let the parsing be done in a user-space utility
that sends the rules to the kernel in a predefined strict format.

You can find how the whole story in the smackv11 announcement here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.lsm/4463

Regards,

-- 
Ahmed S. Darwish
Homepage: http://darwish.07.googlepages.com
Blog: http://darwish-07.blogspot.com
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser, Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sat Nov 3, 12:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sun Nov 11, 2:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Jakob Oestergaard, (Sat Nov 10, 1:05 pm)