Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead | KernelTrap

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead

view
thread

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

[view in full thread]

From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@...>

To: David Miller <davem@...>

Cc: <dada1@...>, <akpm@...>, <linux-arch@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <mathieu.desnoyers@...>, <penberg@...>

Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead

Date: Thursday, November 1, 2007 - 6:16 pm

On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, David Miller wrote:

quoted text> From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 15:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> > On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > 
> > > The remaining issue with accessing per-cpu areas at multiple virtual
> > > addresses is D-cache aliasing.
> > 
> > But that is not an issue for physicallly mapped caches.
> 
> Right but I'd like to use this on sparc64 which has L1 D-cache
> aliasing on some chips :-)

Hmmm... re my message I just send. Then we have to return the memory with 
the virtual address not with the physical address on sparc. May result in 
zones with holes though.

-
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cp..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 31, 8:02 pm)

[PATCH 1/7] One less parameter to __d_path, Jan Blunck, (Mon Oct 29, 8:41 am)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Eric Dumazet, (Thu Nov 1, 3:17 am)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Thu Nov 1, 8:57 am)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 5:28 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Thu Nov 1, 6:11 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 6:14 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Thu Nov 1, 6:16 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 3:57 am)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Thu Nov 1, 9:01 am)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 5:25 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Wed Oct 31, 8:24 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 31, 8:26 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Wed Oct 31, 8:27 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 31, 8:31 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Wed Oct 31, 8:51 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 31, 8:53 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Wed Oct 31, 9:00 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 31, 9:01 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Wed Oct 31, 9:09 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 31, 9:12 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Wed Oct 31, 9:13 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Thu Nov 1, 12:16 am)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 3:01 am)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 5:14 am)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Thu Nov 1, 9:03 am)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 5:29 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Thu Nov 1, 6:15 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 6:38 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Thu Nov 1, 6:48 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Eric Dumazet, (Thu Nov 1, 7:00 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Thu Nov 1, 9:40 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Thu Nov 1, 8:58 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 6:58 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Herbert Xu, (Mon Nov 12, 6:52 am)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Mon Nov 12, 5:28 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Nov 12, 3:14 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Eric Dumazet, (Mon Nov 12, 3:48 pm)

RE: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Luck, Tony, (Mon Nov 12, 3:57 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Eric Dumazet, (Mon Nov 12, 4:14 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Mon Nov 12, 6:46 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Nov 12, 3:56 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Eric Dumazet, (Mon Nov 12, 4:18 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Mon Nov 12, 6:46 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Nov 2, 6:28 am)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Nov 2, 10:35 am)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Nov 2, 11:20 am)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Nov 2, 11:29 am)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Thu Nov 1, 9:06 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 10:51 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 1:38 am)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 31, 9:21 pm)

Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce pe..., David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 1:27 am)

Navigation

Popular discussions


linux-kernel:
debian developer	Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Greg KH	[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
H. Peter Anvin	Re: [PATCH] x86: Construct 32 bit boot time page tables in native format.
Christoph Lameter	Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses
git:

linux-netdev:
Christoph Hellwig	Re: [PATCH 06/32] IGET: Mark iget() and read_inode() as being obsolete [try #2]
Jarek Poplawski	Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
David Miller	[GIT]: Networking
openbsd-misc:

Colocation donated by:

Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 549 guests online.

Online users

Syndicate