login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
November
»
1
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device?
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Rick Jones
Subject:
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device?
Date: Thursday, November 1, 2007 - 3:04 pm
David Miller wrote:
quoted text
> From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> > Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:48:45 -0700 > > >>One could I suppose try to ammend the information passed to allow >>tcpdump to say "oh, this was a tx packet on the same machine on >>which I am tracing so don't worry about checksum mismatch" > > > We do this already!
I'll try to go pester folks in tcpdump-workers then. rick -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device?
, Dave Johnson
, (Wed Oct 31, 11:43 am)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ...
, Stephen Hemminger
, (Wed Oct 31, 12:33 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ...
, Ben Greear
, (Wed Oct 31, 6:06 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ...
, David Miller
, (Wed Oct 31, 6:10 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ...
, Stephen Hemminger
, (Wed Oct 31, 6:23 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ...
, Ben Greear
, (Wed Oct 31, 6:31 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ...
, David Miller
, (Wed Oct 31, 9:50 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ...
, Ben Greear
, (Thu Nov 1, 8:04 am)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ...
, David Miller
, (Thu Nov 1, 2:35 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ...
, Dave Johnson
, (Thu Nov 1, 2:36 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ...
, Rick Jones
, (Thu Nov 1, 2:48 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ...
, David Miller
, (Thu Nov 1, 2:58 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ...
, David Miller
, (Thu Nov 1, 2:59 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ...
, Rick Jones
, (Thu Nov 1, 3:04 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ...
, David Miller
, (Thu Nov 1, 3:07 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ...
, Rick Jones
, (Thu Nov 1, 4:26 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ...
, Dave Johnson
, (Fri Nov 2, 11:08 am)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ...
, David Miller
, (Fri Nov 2, 2:20 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ...
, Michael Chan
, (Fri Nov 2, 2:52 pm)
[PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable of ...
, Dave Johnson
, (Mon Nov 5, 10:46 am)
[PATCH 2/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable of ...
, Dave Johnson
, (Mon Nov 5, 10:47 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable ...
, Patrick McHardy
, (Mon Nov 5, 11:00 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable ...
, David Miller
, (Mon Nov 5, 4:15 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable ...
, Patrick McHardy
, (Mon Nov 5, 5:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable ...
, David Miller
, (Mon Nov 5, 5:35 pm)
RE: [PATCH 2/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable ...
, Ramkrishna Vepa
, (Mon Nov 5, 7:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable ...
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Tue Nov 6, 11:03 am)
RE: [PATCH 2/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable ...
, Ramkrishna Vepa
, (Tue Nov 6, 11:28 am)
RE: [PATCH 2/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable ...
, Dave Johnson
, (Tue Nov 6, 11:34 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable ...
, Ben Greear
, (Tue Nov 6, 11:56 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable ...
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Tue Nov 6, 1:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable ...
, Patrick McHardy
, (Tue Nov 6, 4:55 pm)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
2.6.21.5 june 30th to july 1st date hang?
Jeff Dike
[ PATCH 2/6 ] UML - Formatting fixes around os_{read_write}_file callers
Liam Girdwood
[PATCH 07/13] regulator: regulator test harness
Oleg Nesterov
Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
Stefan Seyfried
Re: 2.6.19-rc5: grub is much slower resuming from suspend-to-disk than in 2.6.18
linux-netdev
:
Arnaud Ebalard
Re: [REGRESSION,BISECTED] MIPv6 support broken by f4f914b58019f0
Jan Engelhardt
Re: [PATCH iptables] extension: add xt_cpu match
Jarek Poplawski
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
[PATCH 8/8] net/emergency: remove locking from reycling pool if emergncy pools are...
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] qlcnic: dont assume NET_IP_ALIGN is 2
git
:
Jakub Narebski
Re: git on MacOSX and files with decomposed utf-8 file names
Brandon Casey
Re: Thunderbird and patches (was Re: [PATCH v2] Enable setting attach as the def...
Christian Couder
[PATCH 1/3] rev-parse: add test script for "--verify"
Ramkumar Ramachandra
Re: [GSoC update] git-remote-svn: The final one
Junio C Hamano
Re: git-rm isn't the inverse action of git-add
openbsd-misc
:
Joachim Schipper
Re: UVC Webcams
Florin Andrei
SOLVED [was: firewall is very slow, something's wrong]
Todd Alan Smith
Re: Microsoft gets the Most Secure Operating Systems award
Neal Hogan
Re: Need Advice: Thinkpad T60 or T61?
Sam Fourman Jr.
Re: Real men don't attack straw men
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ACPI: Disable ARB_DISABLE on platforms where it is not needed
Linux Kernel Mailing List
m68knommu: add read_barrier_depends() and irqs_disabled_flags()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[MTD] Add mtd panic_write function pointer
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[ARM] pxa: remove duplicate select statements from Kconfig
Linux Kernel Mailing List
mlx4_core: Don't read reserved fields in mlx4_QUERY_ADAPTER()
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate