Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb_gigaset: suspend support [v2]

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <gregkh@...>, <linux-usb-devel@...>, <hjlipp@...>, <kkeil@...>, <i4ldeveloper@...>
Date: Thursday, November 1, 2007 - 2:20 pm

Am 30.10.2007 22:01 schrieb Andrew Morton:

Sorry. I promise to mend my ways.

essage)

I'm a great believer in defensive programming. :-)

Anyway, to be sure these checks aren't needed, I would need the
assurance that the suspend and resume methods are serialized with
the probe and disconnect methods. Are they?

Thanks,
Tilman

--=20
Tilman Schmidt                          E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Unge=F6ffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe R=FCckseite)
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb_gigaset: suspend support [v2], Andrew Morton, (Tue Oct 30, 5:01 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb_gigaset: suspend support [v2], Tilman Schmidt, (Thu Nov 1, 2:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb_gigaset: suspend support [v2], Andrew Morton, (Thu Nov 1, 2:45 pm)