login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@...>
Cc: <rientjes@...>, <Lee.Schermerhorn@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <ak@...>
Date: Thursday, November 1, 2007 - 12:06 pm

Christoph, replying to pj:

You might be recalling something called libcpumemset, which is about
five years old.  The library known as libcpuset is SGI's current LGPL
library for use with Linux 2.6 cpusets.



We were discussing libnuma here, not glibc.  The system call wrappers
are in glibc.  System call wrappers should not be setting optional
flags.  They should just make the system call -- do whatever magic it
takes to get the provided arguments into the right registers or other
conventionally determined places, and invoke the necessary machine
instruction to trap into the kernel.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, Paul Jackson, (Wed Oct 31, 2:17 am)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 31, 2:59 pm)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, David Rientjes, (Thu Nov 1, 2:52 pm)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 31, 5:05 pm)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, David Rientjes, (Thu Nov 1, 3:00 pm)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Nov 1, 1:25 am)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Nov 1, 9:07 am)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, Paul Jackson, (Thu Nov 1, 12:06 pm)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, David Rientjes, (Thu Nov 1, 3:03 pm)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Nov 1, 1:07 pm)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, David Rientjes, (Thu Nov 1, 3:06 pm)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Nov 1, 1:44 pm)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, Lee Schermerhorn, (Thu Nov 1, 1:38 pm)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, David Rientjes, (Thu Nov 1, 4:03 am)
speck-geostationary