login
Header Space

 
 

[patch 3/4] x86: spinlock.h merge prep

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Andi Kleen <ak@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Date: Thursday, November 1, 2007 - 10:04 am

Prepare for merging 32 and 64 bit spinlocks, by making them identical
(except for the OOSTORE thing). raw_read_lock and raw_write_lock get a
relaxed register constraint, and 64-bit has a few "=m" constraints changed
to "+m". I hope these things actually make the code better.

Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
---
Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-x86/spinlock_32.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-x86/spinlock_32.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/asm-x86/spinlock_32.h
@@ -98,14 +98,15 @@ static inline int __raw_spin_trylock(raw
 	return ret;
 }
 
-#if defined(CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE) || defined(CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE)
+#if defined(CONFIG_X86_32) && \
+	(defined(CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE) || defined(CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE))
 /*
  * On PPro SMP or if we are using OOSTORE, we use a locked operation to unlock
  * (PPro errata 66, 92)
  */
-#define UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX LOCK_PREFIX
+# define UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX LOCK_PREFIX
 #else
-#define UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX
+# define UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX
 #endif
 
 static inline void __raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
@@ -135,49 +136,42 @@ static inline void __raw_spin_unlock_wai
  *
  * On x86, we implement read-write locks as a 32-bit counter
  * with the high bit (sign) being the "contended" bit.
- *
- * The inline assembly is non-obvious. Think about it.
- *
- * Changed to use the same technique as rw semaphores.  See
- * semaphore.h for details.  -ben
- *
- * the helpers are in arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c
  */
 
 /**
  * read_can_lock - would read_trylock() succeed?
  * @lock: the rwlock in question.
  */
-static inline int __raw_read_can_lock(raw_rwlock_t *x)
+static inline int __raw_read_can_lock(raw_rwlock_t *lock)
 {
-	return (int)(x)->lock > 0;
+	return (int)(lock)->lock > 0;
 }
 
 /**
  * write_can_lock - would write_trylock() succeed?
  * @lock: the rwlock in question.
  */
-static inline int __raw_write_can_lock(raw_rwlock_t *x)
+static inline int __raw_write_can_lock(raw_rwlock_t *lock)
 {
-	return (x)->lock == RW_LOCK_BIAS;
+	return (lock)->lock == RW_LOCK_BIAS;
 }
 
 static inline void __raw_read_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
 {
-	asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX " subl $1,(%0)\n\t"
+	asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "subl $1,(%0)\n\t"
 		     "jns 1f\n"
 		     "call __read_lock_failed\n\t"
 		     "1:\n"
-		     ::"a" (rw) : "memory");
+		     ::"r" (rw) : "memory");
 }
 
 static inline void __raw_write_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
 {
-	asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX " subl $" RW_LOCK_BIAS_STR ",(%0)\n\t"
+	asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "subl %1,(%0)\n\t"
 		     "jz 1f\n"
 		     "call __write_lock_failed\n\t"
 		     "1:\n"
-		     ::"a" (rw) : "memory");
+		     ::"r" (rw), "i" (RW_LOCK_BIAS) : "memory");
 }
 
 static inline int __raw_read_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *lock)
@@ -206,8 +200,8 @@ static inline void __raw_read_unlock(raw
 
 static inline void __raw_write_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
 {
-	asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "addl $" RW_LOCK_BIAS_STR ", %0"
-				 : "+m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
+	asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "addl %1,%0"
+			: "+m" (rw->lock) : "i" (RW_LOCK_BIAS) : "memory");
 }
 
 #define _raw_spin_relax(lock)	cpu_relax()
Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-x86/spinlock_64.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-x86/spinlock_64.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/asm-x86/spinlock_64.h
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 #include <asm/rwlock.h>
 #include <asm/page.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
 
 /*
  * Your basic SMP spinlocks, allowing only a single CPU anywhere
@@ -126,11 +127,19 @@ static inline void __raw_spin_unlock_wai
  * with the high bit (sign) being the "contended" bit.
  */
 
+/**
+ * read_can_lock - would read_trylock() succeed?
+ * @lock: the rwlock in question.
+ */
 static inline int __raw_read_can_lock(raw_rwlock_t *lock)
 {
 	return (int)(lock)->lock > 0;
 }
 
+/**
+ * write_can_lock - would write_trylock() succeed?
+ * @lock: the rwlock in question.
+ */
 static inline int __raw_write_can_lock(raw_rwlock_t *lock)
 {
 	return (lock)->lock == RW_LOCK_BIAS;
@@ -140,18 +149,18 @@ static inline void __raw_read_lock(raw_r
 {
 	asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "subl $1,(%0)\n\t"
 		     "jns 1f\n"
-		     "call __read_lock_failed\n"
+		     "call __read_lock_failed\n\t"
 		     "1:\n"
-		     ::"D" (rw), "i" (RW_LOCK_BIAS) : "memory");
+		     ::"r" (rw) : "memory");
 }
 
 static inline void __raw_write_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
 {
 	asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "subl %1,(%0)\n\t"
 		     "jz 1f\n"
-		     "\tcall __write_lock_failed\n\t"
+		     "call __write_lock_failed\n\t"
 		     "1:\n"
-		     ::"D" (rw), "i" (RW_LOCK_BIAS) : "memory");
+		     ::"r" (rw), "i" (RW_LOCK_BIAS) : "memory");
 }
 
 static inline int __raw_read_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *lock)
@@ -175,13 +184,13 @@ static inline int __raw_write_trylock(ra
 
 static inline void __raw_read_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
 {
-	asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX " ; incl %0" :"=m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
+	asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "incl %0" :"+m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
 }
 
 static inline void __raw_write_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
 {
-	asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX " ; addl $" RW_LOCK_BIAS_STR ",%0"
-				: "=m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
+	asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "addl %1,%0"
+			: "+m" (rw->lock) : "i" (RW_LOCK_BIAS) : "memory");
 }
 
 #define _raw_spin_relax(lock)	cpu_relax()
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 0/4] ticket spinlocks for x86, Nick Piggin, (Thu Nov 1, 10:01 am)
Re: [patch 0/4] ticket spinlocks for x86, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sat Nov 3, 6:36 pm)
[patch 4/4] x86: spinlock.h merge, Nick Piggin, (Thu Nov 1, 10:05 am)
[patch 3/4] x86: spinlock.h merge prep, Nick Piggin, (Thu Nov 1, 10:04 am)
[patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Nick Piggin, (Thu Nov 1, 10:03 am)
Re: [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Chuck Ebbert, (Fri Nov 2, 12:22 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Nov 2, 12:51 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Nick Piggin, (Fri Nov 2, 7:01 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Chuck Ebbert, (Fri Nov 2, 8:56 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Nick Piggin, (Fri Nov 2, 11:41 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Chuck Ebbert, (Thu Nov 1, 4:01 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Nick Piggin, (Thu Nov 1, 8:00 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Gregory Haskins, (Thu Nov 1, 10:40 am)
Re: [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Nov 1, 12:38 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Gregory Haskins, (Fri Nov 2, 10:24 am)
Re: [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Rik van Riel, (Thu Nov 1, 8:35 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Nov 1, 9:19 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Nick Piggin, (Fri Nov 2, 2:42 am)
Re: [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Nov 2, 11:33 am)
Re: [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Nick Piggin, (Wed Nov 7, 4:46 am)
Re: [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Rik van Riel, (Fri Nov 2, 10:05 am)
Re: [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Nick Piggin, (Fri Nov 2, 6:37 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks, Rik van Riel, (Thu Nov 1, 10:01 pm)
[patch 1/4] spinlock: lockbreak cleanup, Nick Piggin, (Thu Nov 1, 10:02 am)
Re: [patch 1/4] spinlock: lockbreak cleanup, Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Nov 1, 10:06 am)
Re: [patch 1/4] spinlock: lockbreak cleanup, Nick Piggin, (Thu Nov 1, 10:29 am)
Re: [patch 1/4] spinlock: lockbreak cleanup, Lee Schermerhorn, (Thu Nov 1, 11:39 am)
Re: [patch 1/4] spinlock: lockbreak cleanup, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Nov 1, 11:46 am)
Re: [patch 1/4] spinlock: lockbreak cleanup, Nick Piggin, (Thu Nov 1, 11:53 am)
speck-geostationary