Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>
Cc: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, November 1, 2007 - 4:58 am

* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:


could we instead justmake sched_nr_latency non-tunable, and recalculate 
it from the sysctl handler whenever sched_latency or 
sched_min_granularity changes? That would avoid not only the division by 
zero bug but also other out-of-spec tunings.

	Ingo
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Fri Oct 26, 5:43 am)
Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Oct 26, 7:23 am)
Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Sun Oct 28, 10:22 pm)
Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Mon Oct 29, 5:37 am)
Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Mon Oct 29, 10:12 pm)
Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Oct 30, 3:26 am)
Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Tue Oct 30, 4:36 am)
Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Wed Oct 31, 5:57 am)
Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Thu Nov 1, 5:34 am)
Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1, Cyrus Massoumi, (Thu Nov 1, 6:02 am)
Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Sun Nov 4, 9:24 pm)
Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1, Cyrus Massoumi, (Mon Nov 5, 5:37 am)
Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Wed Nov 7, 1:30 am)
Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1, Peter Zijlstra, (Wed Oct 31, 6:30 am)
Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Nov 1, 4:58 am)
Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Oct 26, 5:53 am)
Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Sun Oct 28, 8:15 pm)