Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Miller
Date: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 - 9:50 pm

From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:23:37 -0700


The hardware has stripped the VLAN header completely and has not
provided it to us at all.

In my opinion trying to cobble one up by hand using the known TAG is
worse than not providing a VLAN header at all.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ..., Stephen Hemminger, (Wed Oct 31, 12:33 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ..., Stephen Hemminger, (Wed Oct 31, 6:23 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX d ..., David Miller, (Wed Oct 31, 9:50 pm)