Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)

Re: Linux Security Module Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)

view
thread

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

[view in full thread]

From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...>

To: Peter Dolding <oiaohm@...>, Toshiharu Harada <haradats@...>

Cc: Crispin Cowan <crispin@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-security-module@...>

Subject: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)

Date: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 - 10:20 pm

--- Peter Dolding <oiaohm@gmail.com> wrote:


quoted text> Improvements to the single security framework are getting over looked.

Please post proposed patches.

quoted text>   I would have personally though selinux would have done Posix file
> capabilities as a general service to all.

Posix capabilities predate SELinux. SELinux is not interested in
Posix capabilities. 

quoted text> But no IBM had to do it.

Err, no. It was done by Andrew Morgan back in the dark ages.
Why on earth do you think IBM did it?

quoted text> ...

OK, you have all the answers. Show us some code or STFU.


Casey Schaufler
casey@schaufler-ca.com
-
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Rob Meijer, (Mon Oct 29, 3:04 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Casey Schaufler, (Mon Oct 29, 4:27 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Crispin Cowan, (Mon Oct 29, 3:41 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Peter Dolding, (Tue Oct 30, 1:13 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Oct 30, 2:42 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Peter Dolding, (Tue Oct 30, 7:38 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., , (Tue Oct 30, 8:16 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Peter Dolding, (Tue Oct 30, 10:21 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Crispin Cowan, (Wed Oct 31, 2:43 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Toshiharu Harada, (Wed Oct 31, 6:10 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Peter Dolding, (Wed Oct 31, 10:04 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Casey Schaufler, (Wed Oct 31, 10:20 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Peter Dolding, (Wed Oct 31, 10:51 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Andrew Morgan, (Mon Nov 5, 2:56 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Serge E. Hallyn, (Mon Nov 5, 9:29 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Jan Engelhardt, (Thu Nov 1, 3:17 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., David Newall, (Thu Nov 1, 7:49 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Peter Dolding, (Sat Nov 3, 9:28 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Peter Dolding, (Wed Oct 31, 5:03 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., , (Wed Oct 31, 1:08 am)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Casey Schaufler, (Tue Oct 30, 11:43 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Casey Schaufler, (Tue Oct 30, 3:14 pm)

Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion t..., Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Oct 30, 3:50 pm)

Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface, Cliffe, (Tue Oct 30, 3:14 am)

Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface, Simon Arlott, (Tue Oct 30, 8:30 am)

Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface, Crispin Cowan, (Mon Nov 5, 11:46 pm)

Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface, Cliffe, (Tue Nov 6, 3:26 am)

Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface, Peter Dolding, (Tue Nov 6, 7:59 pm)

Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface, Cliffe, (Tue Nov 6, 11:50 pm)

Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface, Casey Schaufler, (Tue Nov 6, 11:35 pm)

Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface, Tetsuo Handa, (Wed Nov 7, 12:11 am)

Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface, Casey Schaufler, (Wed Nov 7, 12:34 am)

Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface, Peter Dolding, (Wed Nov 7, 12:34 am)

Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface, Al Viro, (Tue Oct 30, 2:55 am)

Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface, Crispin Cowan, (Tue Oct 30, 3:55 am)

Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface, Casey Schaufler, (Tue Oct 30, 11:01 am)

Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface, Cliffe, (Tue Oct 30, 4:00 am)

Navigation

Popular discussions


linux-kernel:
Linus Torvalds	Linux 2.6.27-rc5
Greg Kroah-Hartman	[PATCH 007/196] Chinese: add translation of stable_kernel_rules.txt
Kamalesh Babulal	[Build Failure] 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 Build fails with allmodconfig probe_4drives undefined
Gabriel C	Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1
openbsd-misc:

linux-netdev:
David Woodhouse	Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin"
David Miller	Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller	[GIT]: Networking
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments
git:

Colocation donated by:

Online users

nybble

Syndicate