login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
October
»
9
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Subject:
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
Date: Tuesday, October 9, 2007 - 12:11 pm
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
quoted text
> There is no such thing as bit-order. The data lines are numbered, > say, D0 - D31, with D0 being LSB (bit) and D31 MSB. >
Uh-huh. Check out an IBM Power manual some time. J -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
__LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Fri Oct 5, 11:27 am)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Fri Oct 5, 11:35 am)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Fri Oct 5, 12:35 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Fri Oct 5, 12:43 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Fri Oct 5, 12:47 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Andreas Schwab
, (Fri Oct 5, 1:04 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Fri Oct 5, 1:07 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, linux-os (Dick Johnson)
, (Fri Oct 5, 1:34 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Fri Oct 5, 1:37 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Anton Altaparmakov
, (Fri Oct 5, 2:06 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Fri Oct 5, 2:10 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Andreas Schwab
, (Fri Oct 5, 2:17 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Andreas Schwab
, (Fri Oct 5, 2:29 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Fri Oct 5, 2:32 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Andreas Schwab
, (Fri Oct 5, 4:17 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
, (Fri Oct 5, 4:27 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Lennart Sorensen
, (Tue Oct 9, 10:46 am)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Tue Oct 9, 10:56 am)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Lennart Sorensen
, (Tue Oct 9, 11:34 am)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Tue Oct 9, 11:50 am)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Tue Oct 9, 11:57 am)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Tue Oct 9, 12:11 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Tue Oct 9, 12:37 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Tue Oct 9, 12:39 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Tue Oct 9, 12:44 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Tue Oct 9, 2:40 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Tue Oct 9, 3:11 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Tue Oct 9, 3:34 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, linux-os (Dick Johnson)
, (Wed Oct 10, 5:05 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Mel Gorman
Re: [PATCH 1/4] vmstat: remove zone->lock from walk_zones_in_node
Guenter Roeck
Re: [lm-sensors] Location for thermal drivers
David Woodhouse
Re: RFC: Moving firmware blobs out of the kernel.
Siddha, Suresh B
Re: [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [11/25] x86: default to physical mode on hotplug CPU k...
Peter Zijlstra
Re: [patch 4/6] mm: merge populate and nopage into fault (fixes nonlinear)
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[MIPS] Fix potential latency problem due to non-atomic cpu_wait.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
USB: rename USB_SPEED_VARIABLE to USB_SPEED_WIRELESS
Linux Kernel Mailing List
lib/vsprintf.c: fix bug omitting minus sign of numbers (module_param)
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[Bluetooth] Initiate authentication during connection establishment
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[POWERPC] 4xx: Add ppc40x_defconfig
linux-netdev
:
MERCEDES
Your mail id has won 950,000.00 in the MERCEDES Benz Online Promo.for claims send:
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] xen/netfront: do not mark packets of length < MSS as GSO
David Miller
Re: skb_segment() questions
Shan Wei
[RFC PATCH net-next 2/5]IPv6:netfilter: Send an ICMPv6 "Fragment Reassembly Timeou...
Stanislaw Gruszka
[PATCH 1/4] bnx2x: use smp_mb() to keep ordering of read write operations
git
:
Nicolas Sebrecht
git-svn died of signal 11 (was "3 failures on test t9100 (svn)")
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add url.<base>.pushInsteadOf: URL rewriting for push only
Martin Langhoff
Re: [PATCH] GIT commit statistics.
Alexandre Julliard
[PATCH] gitweb: Put back shortlog instead of graphiclog in the project list.
Josh Triplett
[PATCH 2/2] Add url.<base>.pushInsteadOf: URL rewriting for push only
openbsd-misc
:
Taisto Qvist XX
Re: AMD GEODE LX-800 just works with kernel from install42.iso and kernelpanics wi...
Nico Meijer
Re: gOS Develop Kit with VIA pc-1 Processor Platform VIA C7-D
Andreas Bihlmaier
Re: jetway board sensors (Fintek F71805F)
admin
Drive a 2009 car from R799p/m
Antti Harri
Re: how to create a sha256 hash
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate