Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Roland Dreier
Date: Tuesday, October 9, 2007 - 10:25 am

> > > + (b) Any problems, concerns, or questions relating to the patch have been
 > > > +     communicated back to the submitter.  I am satisfied with how the
 > > > +     submitter has responded to my comments.
 > > 
 > > This seems more detailed that necessary.  The process (communicated
 > > back / responded) is not really relevant.
 > 
 > Instead, it seems to me that the process is crucially important.

I agree with you Jon.  In fact my first reaction to your initial post
was that this section (b) was the most succinct distillation of the
most important part of reviewing that I've seen.

 - R.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight , Neil Brown, (Mon Oct 8, 5:05 pm)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight , Jonathan Corbet, (Tue Oct 9, 9:49 am)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Roland Dreier, (Tue Oct 9, 10:25 am)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, Sam Ravnborg, (Tue Oct 9, 10:44 am)
Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight, David Chinner, (Tue Oct 9, 5:06 pm)