On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 11:00:28AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
quoted text
> 
> On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 22:01 +0200, Roel Kluin wrote:
> > Greg KH wrote:
> > 
> > @@ -477,10 +479,15 @@ nlmsvc_testlock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, 
> >  
> >  	if (block == NULL) {
> >  		struct file_lock *conf = kzalloc(sizeof(*conf), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +		struct nlm_host	*host;
> >  
> >  		if (conf == NULL)
> >  			return nlm_granted;
> > -		block = nlmsvc_create_block(rqstp, file, lock, cookie);
> > +		/* Create host handle for callback */
> > +		host = nlmsvc_lookup_host(rqstp, lock->caller, lock->len);
> > +		if (host == NULL)
> > +			return nlm_lck_denied_nolocks;
> > +		block = nlmsvc_create_block(rqstp, host, file, lock, cookie);
> >  		if (block == NULL) {
> >  			kfree(conf);
> >  			return nlm_granted;
> > 
> > To be frankly I don't know what this is about, but shouldn't conf be freed if host == NULL?
> 
> Thanks for spotting this!
> 
> Greg, should I resend this patch, or would you prefer an incremental
> fix?

An incremental one would be best.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/