One of the complaints that I continue to hear is that kbuild is lacking a way to 'remember' the ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE values originally used. Likewise we have people that change ARCH settings and get a lot of build errors due to asm symlink pointing at the wrong directory. This patch tries to address this by saving ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE settings and error out if user specify anohter ARCH or CROSS_COMPILE setting. If there is inconsistency then error out and suggest to run make mrproper. This will as a side-effect prevent a build with the wrong asm symlink. The settings are stored in the build directory in a file named "Kbuild.config" (should it be a .dot file?). I have tested it here with success - but please give it a try in your setup and let me know if anything breaks. The patch is on top of latest linus tree but should apply with some fuzz to -mm too (at least it apply on top of my kbuild.git tree). PS. I do not like adding additional cruft to the top-level Makefile but did not find an easy way to push this to kconfig. Sam diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 6fc97bf..9f6d03f 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -182,8 +182,33 @@ SUBARCH := $(shell uname -m | sed -e s/i.86/i386/ -e s/sun4u/sparc64/ \ # Default value for CROSS_COMPILE is not to prefix executables # Note: Some architectures assign CROSS_COMPILE in their arch/*/Makefile -ARCH ?= $(SUBARCH) -CROSS_COMPILE ?= +# Kbuild save the ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE setting in Kbuild.config +# Restore these settings and check that user did not specify +# conflicting values. +Kbuild.config: ; +noconfigcheck-targets := clean mrproper distclean help %config + +ifneq ($(wildcard Kbuild.config),) + -include Kbuild.config + ifeq ($(filter $(noconfigcheck-targets),$(MAKECMDGOALS)),) + ifneq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),) + ifneq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),$(KBUILD_CROSS_COMPILE)) + $(error CROSS_COMPILE changed from ...
Yea, finally. What about, that this is the first ever prompt, that must be shown and written to the .config? The zeroth one is an config entry of kernel version(s), .config can configure and thus build successfully. This are among other ideas about kconfig/kbuild, you know nothing about yet. So, what do you think? Also, i'd like to propose sequencing of config-enable-build-this-unit in config file(s), thus Makefile(s) (sometimes very small and stupid) will be not necessary. Additional link ordering can be supplied as meta-config information there. Shell scripting, very ugly in the view of make syntax, will be natural in config files. Extending build process to get hidden dependencies or right linking/other magic is part of particular configuration. Hm? And i want to repeat this to the wall: make is stupid `test -nt` (non POSIX, but accepted my shells and GNU test feature). Making any kind of hashing to make dream of kbuild-2.5 developers/fans -- more complete `up-to-date' heuristic possible, is just like `md5sum > $OBJDIR/heuristic.com`, which is config selectable (for those, who don't like a bit of slowdown). -- -o--=O`C #oo'L O <___=E M -
Two issues to fix before we can do this: 1) chocie values cannot have more than one prompt 2) We need to share much more Kconfig* between the individual architectures First step is to let all arch's use drivers/Kconfig Let's get the two items above solved then we can revisit adding arch selection to kconfig (where it belongs in the end). Discussed before but so far no patches has shown up. Sam -
2) isn't terribly difficult, just takes some time and willingness of $arch maintainers to some changes, but please explain a bit more --- ~Randy -
Maybe I didn't read carefully: "to add arch selection to kconfig".. arch/cris using drivers/Kconfig: patch is below (maintainer is --- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Move arch/cris to using drivers/Kconfig for its drivers config list. When all arches do this, Sam can make more interesting improvements to .config files. Using drivers/Kconfig adds these kconfig files to cris: connector, misc, ata, message/fusion (not avail.), macintosh (not avail.), i2c, spi, w1, power, hwmon, mfd, video, hid, mmc, leds, infiniband (not avail.), edac (not avail.), rtc, dma, auxdisplay, kvm (not avail.), uio, and lguest (not avail.). Many of these are already enabled/disabled per arch., so adding that for cris can be done as required. "not avail." means that this menu is not valid for this arch. and won't be presented to users when running 'make *config'. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> --- arch/cris/Kconfig | 40 +--------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 39 deletions(-) --- linux-2.6.23-rc9-git6.orig/arch/cris/Kconfig +++ linux-2.6.23-rc9-git6/arch/cris/Kconfig @@ -153,49 +153,11 @@ source arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/Kconfi endmenu -source "drivers/base/Kconfig" - # standard linux drivers -source "drivers/mtd/Kconfig" - -source "drivers/parport/Kconfig" - -source "drivers/pnp/Kconfig" - -source "drivers/block/Kconfig" - -source "drivers/md/Kconfig" - -source "drivers/ide/Kconfig" - -source "drivers/scsi/Kconfig" - -source "drivers/ieee1394/Kconfig" - -source "drivers/message/i2o/Kconfig" - -source "drivers/net/Kconfig" - -source "drivers/isdn/Kconfig" - -source "drivers/telephony/Kconfig" - -# -# input before char - char/joystick depends on it. As does USB. -# -source "drivers/input/Kconfig" - -source "drivers/char/Kconfig" - -#source drivers/misc/Config.in -source "drivers/media/Kconfig" +source "drivers/Kconfig" source "fs/Kconfig" -source ...
A prerequisite for moving ARCH selection to Kconfig is that we read in all Kconfig files for all architectures. To do so efficient we should avoind including the same Kconfig file for each architecture which is obviously the case today. The efficiency comes both with respect to reading the files but also memory consumption. If we read in drivers/Kconfig only once then we will avoid some duplication compared to reading drivers/Kconfig once for each architecture. The structure we should aim for is something like a top-level Kconfig file that pull in relevant parts from the kernel tree and where the arch Kconfig only pull in additional Kconfig files from that arch. When we get this far we will have a more logical structure in the Kconfig file and their distribution. But the showstopper is the part with choice value that cannot have more than a single prompt so when we have the same choice value used in two arch Kconfig files then kconfig will warn and the choice will do the wrong thing. I never took a deeper look at this - I seem to get distracted each time I try to understand all the inner details of the kconfig use of data structures. Sam -
what occupying all my time now is to try to make fast and easy (text/tty) user interface, based solely on TERM=linux capability. It is such, but deep in ncurses/lxdialog wrappers. Having more flexible TUI without all past stereotypes is the major point in making any progress for flexible configuration interface. Remember, how blind `select` hurts. All syntax wars are over, now order is the second thing to achieve. Like in x86 merge case, this is purely technical thing with a bit of manual work after that. sed magic for (nearly any kind :) of textual processing i can guarantee without (yet another) C (like fixdep.c, parts of Since i try to do test driven development, it's more easy for me to understand/fix/test today's things via making bits from scratch. Fresh view can do more on debugging of the logic level also. ____ -
A .dot file sounds better.
And even if not, generated files should IMHO not share the Kbuild*
namespace with non-generated files.
cu
Adrian
BTW: I'm currently trying without success to understand why the
drivers/infiniband/{hw/amso1100,ulp/srp}/Kbuild files are not
named "Makefile".
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
or the inverse ;-) Why all Makefiles (but the top level one ) are not named Kbuild, considering that they are not valid (standalone) Makefile. ciao cate -
I will make it ".kbuild". Droppeing the .config bits of the name will hopefully avoid that Giacomo explained this already.. But I have never done a global renaming - the pain/benefit ratio seems too low. Sam -
Either keep all as "Makefile" or rename all.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
Can you do this in a way that there are still these ARCH/CROSS_COMPILE lines that are just overriden when empty or have their default value? This way defaults could be still patched in for special cases. -Andi -
If it is OK to drop the $(SUBARCH) assingment like this then yes. ARCH ?= CROSS_COMPILE ?= I was wondering why we had the empty CROSS_COMPILE assigment and this explains why. But why patch something in here in the fisrt place? It seems to be a workaround for the actual issue this patch addresses - no? Sam -
As long as both UML and normal architectures work still out of the Mostly. The difference is that Kbuild.config would likely contain other stuff too that might be not fit into a patch? Ok it's not a big difference. -Andi -
Does the UML build still work when you do that? Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com -
The original behaviour is kept is ARCH is not set on the commandline and saved in .kbuild (Kbuild.config in the patch). The logic goes basically like this: If there is no .kbuild file then set ARCH = $(SUBARCH) else set ARCH = saved ARCH from .kbuild. And then a bit sanity check that the user does not try to change architecture in the middle. I actually used um as testing ground for this patch so it works for um in my way of building um. I considered switching architectures automagically but concluded that in most cases when a user change ARCH then that's because the user forgot to specify ARCH or more seldom forgot what ARCH was being built in that directory. Sam -
Great, thanks. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com -
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 22:02:55 +0200 -
