Re: [PATCH -mm -v4 1/3] i386/x86_64 boot: setup data

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@...>
Cc: <linux-mm@...>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, Andi Kleen <ak@...>, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...>, <akpm@...>, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...>, Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, October 8, 2007 - 12:28 pm

On Tuesday 09 October 2007 18:55, Huang, Ying wrote:


OK. I don't really know the code, but I trust you ;)



Ah, I see. I missed that.

OK, well rather than make it weak, and have everyone except
i386 override it, can you just ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM?

After that, I guess most other architectures wouldn't even
use the function. Maybe it can go into lib/ instead so that
it can be discarded by the linker if it isn't used?
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH -mm -v4 1/3] i386/x86_64 boot: setup data, Huang, Ying, (Tue Oct 9, 2:40 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm -v4 1/3] i386/x86_64 boot: setup data, Nick Piggin, (Mon Oct 8, 11:25 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm -v4 1/3] i386/x86_64 boot: setup data, huang ying, (Tue Oct 9, 10:00 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm -v4 1/3] i386/x86_64 boot: setup data, Andi Kleen, (Tue Oct 9, 10:04 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm -v4 1/3] i386/x86_64 boot: setup data, Huang, Ying, (Tue Oct 9, 4:22 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm -v4 1/3] i386/x86_64 boot: setup data, Nick Piggin, (Mon Oct 8, 12:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm -v4 1/3] i386/x86_64 boot: setup data, Huang, Ying, (Tue Oct 9, 4:55 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm -v4 1/3] i386/x86_64 boot: setup data, Oleg Verych, (Tue Oct 9, 7:44 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm -v4 1/3] i386/x86_64 boot: setup data, Nick Piggin, (Mon Oct 8, 12:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm -v4 1/3] i386/x86_64 boot: setup data, Huang, Ying, (Tue Oct 9, 5:26 am)