Re: [PATCH] mm: set_page_dirty_balance() vs ->page_mkwrite()

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@...>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, David Howells <dhowells@...>, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...>, hugh <hugh@...>, stable <stable@...>
Date: Monday, October 8, 2007 - 10:12 pm

On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:47:52PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:

I agree. We could also insert a call to balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() in
__ocfs2_page_mkwrite.
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
mark.fasheh@oracle.com
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] mm: set_page_dirty_balance() vs ->page_mkwrite(), Mark Fasheh, (Mon Oct 8, 10:12 pm)