Re: lockdep: how to tell it multiple pte locks is OK?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Subject: Re: lockdep: how to tell it multiple pte locks is OK?

Date: Monday, October 8, 2007 - 5:20 pm

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
quoted text> s/implemented/merged/ :)
>
> IN fact shared pagetables are already there for hugepages.
> For small pages it's a patch at this point.
>   

Is it kept up to date?  Where does it live?

quoted text> no I'm not saying that. I'm just saying that I'm worried about the
> locking robustness of your trick in general.
>   

Hm, well I won't need to re-pin shared ptes anyway, so I think it's moot.

    J
-
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

lockdep: how to tell it multiple pte locks is OK?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sat Oct 6, 11:31 pm)

Re: lockdep: how to tell it multiple pte locks is OK?, Peter Zijlstra, (Sun Oct 7, 1:29 am)

Re: lockdep: how to tell it multiple pte locks is OK?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sun Oct 7, 8:06 am)

Re: lockdep: how to tell it multiple pte locks is OK?, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Oct 7, 9:58 am)

Re: lockdep: how to tell it multiple pte locks is OK?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sun Oct 7, 10:17 am)

Re: lockdep: how to tell it multiple pte locks is OK?, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Oct 7, 10:46 am)

Re: lockdep: how to tell it multiple pte locks is OK?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Oct 8, 5:20 pm)


linux-kernel:
Ken Chen	[patch] sched: fix inconsistency when redistribute per-cpu tg->cfs_rq shares.
Ingo Molnar	Re: [PATCH v3] x86: merge the simple bitops and move them to bitops.h
Paul Turner	[tg_shares_up rewrite v4 11/11] sched: update tg->shares after cpu.shares write
Andi Kleen	Re: - romsignature-checksum-cleanup-2.patch removed from -mm tree
Axel Lin	[PATCH] tc6393xb: fix wrong goto labels for error handling
git:
Christian Jaeger	Re: Problem with Git.pm bidi_pipe methods
Linus Torvalds	Re: mingw, windows, crlf/lf, and git
Nicolas Pitre	Re: [PATCH 2/2] Implement a simple delta_base cache
Linus Torvalds	[PATCH 1/7] Make unpack_trees_options bit flags actual bitfields
Jeff King	[PATCH 1/4] t4012: use test_cmp instead of cmp
git-commits-head:
Linux Kernel Mailing List	i2c-i801: Add Intel Cougar Point device IDs
Linux Kernel Mailing List	Staging: batman-adv: splitting /proc vis file into vis_server and vis_data
Linux Kernel Mailing List	drm/i915: Add information on pinning and fencing to the i915 list debug.
Linux Kernel Mailing List	ocfs2: Stop orphan scan as early as possible during umount
Linux Kernel Mailing List	x86, apic: clean up spurious vector sanity check
linux-netdev:
Richard Cochran	Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ptp: Added a clock that uses the eTSEC found on the MPC85xx.
Gerrit Renker	v2 [PATCH 1/4] dccp: Limit feature negotiation to connection setup phase
Lennert Buytenhek	Re: [PATCH 3/6] [NET] dsa: add support for original DSA tagging format
Inaky Perez-Gonzalez	[PATCH 40/40] wimax/i2400m: add CREDITS and MAINTAINERS entries
Pavel Emelyanov	[PATCH net-2.6.26 2/2][NETNS]: The generic per-net pointers.
freebsd-current:
Boris Samorodov	Re: twa + dump = sbwait
John Baldwin	Re: Possible case of sched_ule never honoring cpu_set affinity?
韓家標 Bill Hacker	Re: ZFS honesty
samira	sata atapi on ich9r
Bjoern A. Zeeb	Re: Can not boot 7.0-BETA3 with IPSEC