Re: parallel networking

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Miller
Date: Monday, October 8, 2007 - 3:33 pm

From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 18:30:18 -0400


With the lock shuttling back and forth between those cpus, which is
what we're trying to avoid.

Multiply whatever effect you think you might be able to measure due to
that on your 2 or 4 way system, and multiple it up to 64 cpus or so
for machines I am using.  This is where machines are going, and is
going to become the norm.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: parallel networking, David Miller, (Mon Oct 8, 2:11 pm)
Re: parallel networking, jamal, (Mon Oct 8, 3:30 pm)
Re: parallel networking, David Miller, (Mon Oct 8, 3:33 pm)
RE: parallel networking, Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P, (Mon Oct 8, 3:35 pm)
Re: parallel networking, jamal, (Mon Oct 8, 4:42 pm)
Re: parallel networking, Jeff Garzik, (Mon Oct 8, 6:53 pm)