On Oct 8 2007 19:37, Sam Ravnborg wrote:At least formal try: * Used by original submitter(s). * Also used by maintainers to track the patch's path (ATM, does not imply "I have look at it in depth") * Used by random people to express their (dis)like/experience with the patch. * I am maintaner or an 'important' person and have had a look at it in depth * Used by original submitter to denote additional maintainers it goes to * Parties who should be Cced when an a posteriori question comes up My 2¥. Jan -
| Stephen Smalley | Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
git: | |
| David Fenyes | sigsetmask()? (LINUX) |
| Stephen Tweedie | Unmounting root (no kidding!) [was: Some Linux problems---solved] |
| Les Andrzejewski | X386/WD90C31/SUMSUNG SYNC MASTER 4 |
| Doug Evans | Re: Stabilizing Linux |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Herbert Xu | Re: [PATCH] myr10ge: again fix lro_gen_skb() alignment |
