Re: [PATCH 0/2] [RFC] RT: Optionally allow IRQF_NODELAY on serial console

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, <mingo@...>, <linux-rt-users@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, October 8, 2007 - 10:41 am

--
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Gregory Haskins wrote:

Ah, that was in the second patch (I didn't look at that. My fault). I
didn't see this description in the comments. But you are right, it is very
close to what I did too. But before we add this to -rt, it will need to
probably need to be tested quite a bit more. Especially since this is more
to help us developers than to help end users.

I would like to see something like this eventually make it into RT.  Just
because there has been too many times that this would be useful. For now I
just use the NMI watchdog and soft lockup detect. But those are very
limiting.


Yes, thanks!

-- Steve

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/2] [RFC] RT: Optionally allow IRQF_NODELAY on s..., Steven Rostedt, (Mon Oct 8, 10:41 am)