On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 23:31:33 -0700

quoted text
> I'm presume I'm the first person to try holding multiple pte locks at
> once, so there's no existing locking order for these locks.  I'm
> always traversing and locking the pagetable in virtual address order
> (and this seems like a sane-enough rule for anyone else who wants to
> hold multiple pte locks).

I'm not sure that's a valid assumption in light of things like sharing
pagetables between processes etc etc..
(granted, that one is out of tree right now but I still hope it'll go
in some day:)
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/