On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 11:03:38PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:Do you really think so? Yes, there are possibly LKML bots, that will read all messages in every thread. But i doubt they are humans. I also think, that kill-files and kill-names are common tools of the LKML readers. Thus, if someone sees my name with something like NAK in the subject, then nothing to worry about: next, please. I just amazed how inefficiently Subject, To, Cc headers are used. Everybody hurry through huge mail backlogs with subjects in thread all like one. Summary and keywords headers are not used, so why not to make greping/selecting interesting/useful messages more efficient (and not only for those who is in Cc list)? Every mail/news reader displays To and Subject, so latter is last hope of increasing of efficiency, even in small threads. Sorry, i cannot see, what you are trying to say here. To place all acks-by to subject? No, just to get summary in one particular reply. ____ -
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Justin C. Sherrill | Mailing list archive |
| Ingo Molnar | [patch 08/13] syslets: x86, add move_user_context() method |
git: | |
| Steven Rostedt | Re: -rt scheduling: wakeup bug? |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
