Re: [PATCH] task containersv11 add tasks file interface fix for cpusets

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, <nickpiggin@...>, <a.p.zijlstra@...>, <serue@...>, <clg@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <ebiederm@...>, <svaidy@...>, <xemul@...>, <containers@...>, <balbir@...>
Date: Saturday, October 6, 2007 - 5:11 pm

On 10/6/07, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:

Is that necessary? If some other process calls set_cpus_allowed()
concurrently with a cpuset cpus update, it's not clear that there's
any defined serialization semantics that have to be achieved, as long
as the end result is that the task's cpus_allowed are within the
cpuset's cpus_allowed.

Paul
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] task containersv11 add tasks file interface fix ..., Paul Menage, (Sat Oct 6, 5:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH] task containersv11 add tasks file interface fix ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Oct 11, 7:20 pm)