Kyle Moffett wrote:
quoted text
> On Oct 04, 2007, at 21:44:02, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> What we want from the LSM is the ability to say -EPERM when we can 
>> clearly articulate that we want to disallow something.
> 
> This sort of depends on perspective; typically with security 
> infrastructure you actually want "... the ability to return success when 
> we can clearly articulate that we want to *ALLOW* something".  File 
> permissions work this way; we don't have a list of forbidden users 
> attached to each file, we have an owner, a group, and a mode 
> representing positive permissions.  With that said in certain high-risk 
> environments you need something even stronger that cannot be changed by 
> the "owner" of the file, if we don't entirely trust them,
> 
Other than ACLs, of course, which do allow blacklisting individual users.

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/