Re: [PATCH] vc bell config

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <adaplas@...>
Date: Saturday, October 6, 2007 - 6:10 am

On Oct 5 2007 17:00, Andrew Morton wrote:

The user has a number of choices:
- rmmod pcspkr, to disable all beeps (including X)
- vt.bell_enabled=0, to disable beeps on all VCs, but not X
- vt.default_bell_pitch=400, to give VC the frequency used in X
  (400 is perceived less penetrant than 750)


They are still default, as in: they will define the initial
pitch/duration when a tty is created, or when the tty is reset.

If they were just 'bell_pitch', one culd assume that changing it
changes the pitch of all ttys, which it does not. Whether it's good
or not that the vc subsytem has per-tty pitches is a different story.

Well, that's what I am thinking about it.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] vc bell config, Jan Engelhardt, (Fri Oct 5, 7:55 am)
Re: [PATCH] vc bell config, Pavel Machek, (Thu Oct 11, 2:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH] vc bell config, Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Oct 17, 12:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH] vc bell config, Pavel Machek, (Wed Oct 17, 6:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH] vc bell config, Andrew Morton, (Fri Oct 5, 8:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH] vc bell config, Jan Engelhardt, (Sat Oct 6, 6:10 am)
Re: [PATCH] vc bell config, Alan Cox, (Sat Oct 6, 5:55 am)
Re: [PATCH] vc bell config, Jan Engelhardt, (Sat Oct 6, 6:02 am)