| From | Subject | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Scott Simpson | Re: Conflict when loading initio driver
I tried this fix on my SuSE 10.3 system (2.6.22.5-29 kernel) and it
didn't work. The system froze on boot. I think there might be more to
it.
Scott
-
| Oct 5, 11:32 pm 2007 |
| WANG Cong | [Patch]Documentation/watchdog/src/watchdog-simple.c: improve...
Make some improvements for Documentation/watchdog/src/watchdog-simple.c.
CC: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/watchdog/src/watchdog-simple.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.23-rc9/Documentation/watchdog/src/watchdog-simple.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.23-rc9.orig/Documentation/watchdog/src/watchdo...
| Oct 5, 11:17 pm 2007 |
| Mike Kravetz | -rt more realtime scheduling issues
Hi Ingo,
After applying the fix to try_to_wake_up() I was still seeing some large
latencies for realtime tasks. Some debug code pointed out two additional
causes of these latencies. I have put fixes into my 'old' kernel and the
scheduler related latencies have gone away. I'm pretty confident that
one of these bugs still exist in the latest RT patch set. Not so sure
about the other. But, I wanted to describe in detail so that you could
address in the latest version of the code if applicable.
...
| Oct 5, 10:15 pm 2007 |
| WANG Cong | [Patch]Documentation/spi/spidev_test.c: constify some variab...
Constify two char pointers and a struct in Documentation/spi/spidev_test.c.
CC: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
CC: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/spi/spidev_test.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.23-rc9/Documentation/spi/spidev_test.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.23-rc9.orig...
| Oct 5, 10:02 pm 2007 |
| David Brownell | Oct 5, 10:12 pm 2007 | |
| Matthew Reppert | G33 graphics broken after 2.6.23-rc6
I've got a new-ish system that I've been trying to get working that's
very close; the only things left are networking (which the latest e1000
driver from sf.net might fix) and graphics.
The system is a DG33TL micro ATX motherboard with a 2.13GHz Core 2 Duo
processor and 2GB RAM. The graphics adapter is:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31 Express
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA])
Subsystem: Intel Corporation Unknown device 5044
...
| Oct 5, 8:20 pm 2007 |
| ohyama_sec | [PATCH]dose it make get_swap_page(mm/swapfiles.c) good perfo...
-hiroyasu ohyama
I wonder what corrected attached source makes good performance of
getting page slot cluster from page area discripter which is written
"si" in the source codes.
Because I think head of swap_list_t discripter doesn't suggest index of
swap area which is same priority that swap_list.next but one which is
the highest priority in the priority's list.
the si->swap_map which have high priority may be chosen by
get_swap_page(), so that page slot of low priority's swap area may hav...
| Oct 5, 8:04 pm 2007 |
| Roland Dreier | Updated InfiniBand/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.24
Since 2.6.23 still isn't out, and I've managed to reduce my patch
review backlog a bit, it's probably a good idea to give another update
about what I have queued for 2.6.24 already and what I hope to get to
before the merge window opens.
Core:
- My user_mad P_Key index support patch. Merged this, although I
still owe Sasha a patch to update libraries to use this.
- A fix to the user_mad 32-bit big-endian userspace 64/32 problem
with the method_mask when registering agents. Merged.
...
| Oct 5, 7:18 pm 2007 |
| Randy Dunlap | [PATCH] dontdiff: update based on gitignore updates
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Update dontdiff, based on .gitignore patches from
Pete Zaitcev and Adrian Bunk.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
---
Documentation/dontdiff | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-2.6.23-rc9-git3.orig/Documentation/dontdiff
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc9-git3/Documentation/dontdiff
@@ -42,6 +42,9 @@
*.9.gz
.*
.cscope
+.gitignore
+.mailmap
+.mm
53c700_d.h
53c7xx_d.h
53c7xx_u.h
...
| Oct 5, 6:42 pm 2007 |
| Chris Bergeron | Syba 8-Port Serial Card Unidentified By Kernel
Hello all,
I've just installed a multiport serial card released by an outfit called
Syba. This is an 8 port serial-only card with an Octopus style breakout
cable. The main chipset on it is an ITE IT8871F.
I've got two questions on this: Is there a driver I should try force
loading on it (and if so, what options to use)? and is there any useful
testing I can do to report back to the LKML on this card?
Thanks for your time, diagnostic output follows.
-- Chris
The following comes up fro...
| Oct 5, 5:31 pm 2007 |
| Nicholas Miell | Re: Syba 8-Port Serial Card Unidentified By Kernel
Try echo -n "10b5 9016" > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/serial/new_id and let
Russell King (rmk+serial@arm.linux.org.uk) know if it works (or if it
doesn't, for that matter).
--
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>
-
| Oct 5, 6:43 pm 2007 |
| Trent Piepho | Reloading DVB drivers broken since 2.6.22, worked in 2.6.21
After a dvb card driver is unloaded and then loaded again, it is no longer
possible to access the dvr device.
Example:
cat /dev/dvb/adapter0/dvr0
kill with ^C
rmmod cx88-dvb
modprobre cx88-dvb
cat /dev/dvb/adapter0/dvr0
cat: /dev/dvb/adapter0/dvr0: No such device
On kernel 2.6.21, this worked fine. In order to get dvb working again,
it's necessary to unload and reload the dvb-core modules.
I strongly suspect commit 57861b432bda77f8bfafda2fb6f5a922d5f3aef1
is somehow related to this prob...
| Oct 5, 5:03 pm 2007 |
| Jeff Garzik | libata-dev.git rebased; ACPI turned on
1) I just rebased libata-dev.git and all its branches. If you are
unfamiliar with git rebasing, this means you must either re-clone, or
force-update your branch like this:
# grab latest nv-swncq branch
URL=git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
cd /local/repo/libata-dev
git-checkout master # or any branch other than what
# is being updated
git-fetch -f $URL nv-swncq:nv-swncq # force update of 'nv-swncq'
2) libata ACPI support has been turned on by default...
| Oct 5, 4:46 pm 2007 |
| Randy Dunlap | [PATCH] pci: implement "pci=noaer"
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
For cases in which CONFIG_PCIEAER=y (such as distro kernels), allow users
to disable PCIE Advanced Error Reporting by using "pci=noaer" on the
kernel command line.
This can be used to work around hardware or (kernel) software problems.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
---
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 4 ++++
drivers/pci/pci.c | 2 ++
drivers/pci/pci.h | 6 ++++++...
| Oct 5, 4:17 pm 2007 |
| Jan Engelhardt | [PATCH] Cute feature: colored printk output
Colored kernel message output
Let's work more on Linux's cuteness! [http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/4/431]
The following patch makes it possible to give kernel messages a
selectable color which helps to distinguish it from other noise,
such as boot messages. NetBSD has it, OpenBSD has it, FreeBSD to some
extent, so I think Linux should too.
Inspired by cko (http://freshmeat.net/p/cko/), but independently
written, later contributed forth and back.
Already posted at: [ message continues ] " title="http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/1...">http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/1... | Oct 5, 3:13 pm 2007 |
| Krzysztof Halasa | Re: [PATCH] Cute feature: colored printk output
I'm certainly not a native English writer, though I think it
should be "composed of" or maybe "composed from".
I'd say "HF is known not to work with VGA console" or just
"HF doesn't work with VGA console".
I wonder how accurate is it.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
-
| Oct 5, 7:22 pm 2007 |
| Jan Engelhardt | Re: [PATCH] Cute feature: colored printk output
ANSI:
\e[31m R--
\e[32m G--
\e[33m RG- (yellow)
\e[34m --B
\e[35m R-B (magenta)
\e[36m -GB (cyan)
\e[37m RGB (white)
ASCII:
1 --B blue
2 -G- green
3 -GB cyan
4 R-- red
...
e.g. just the other way around. 0x17 is gray-on-blue, what I use,
Since I do not use 512-glyph fonts, I do not know.
I suppose no, since that is what is written in the manpages or so.
With FB where the hardware draws the font, I do not know either,
I suppose yes.
With FB where the software draws th...
| Oct 5, 7:47 pm 2007 |
| Krzysztof Halasa | Re: [PATCH] Cute feature: colored printk output
Actually I meant "how accurate my remarks are" :-)
Not convinced WRT ASCII color codes, though. ASCII doesn't contain
codes for changing colors. Perhaps some specific "extended ASCII"?
--
Krzysztof Halasa
-
| Oct 5, 8:10 pm 2007 |
| Jan Engelhardt | Re: [PATCH] Cute feature: colored printk output
Start up QBasic, issue
COLOR 1
=> blue.
Apply said patch, issue
vt.printk_color=0x01
=> you get what?
So! :)
-
| Oct 5, 8:23 pm 2007 |
| Jan Engelhardt | Re: [PATCH] Cute feature: colored printk output
What we see here might not be "ASCII", but "VGA-specific color values".
It's just that I call it ASCII since it's the mirrored opposite of ANSI.
-
| Oct 5, 8:26 pm 2007 |
| Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1 | RE: [PATCH] Cute feature: colored printk output
I like it. A somewhat related nice feature would be to print different
loglevels with different colors.
Cheers,
Emil.
-
| Oct 5, 4:23 pm 2007 |
| Lennart Sorensen | Re: [PATCH] Cute feature: colored printk output
Shouldn't the default at least be what we already had? Somehow grey on
blue sounds pretty hard to read to me.
--
Len Sorensen
-
| Oct 5, 3:19 pm 2007 |
| Jan Engelhardt | Re: [PATCH] Cute feature: colored printk output
Indeed it should be 0x07, should it go in.
Otherwise the openbsd camp might start another flamewar.
(On a personal note, would 0x1F work better for you?)
-
| Oct 5, 3:21 pm 2007 |
| Lennart Sorensen | Re: [PATCH] Cute feature: colored printk output
No, I actually find most things hard to read on a blue background.
Besides black uses less power on a CRT (and probably OLED as well)
monitor. LCDs probably don't care. :)
--
Len Sorensen
-
| Oct 5, 3:24 pm 2007 |
| Jan Engelhardt | Re: [PATCH] Cute feature: colored printk output
Ah you seem to be a proponent of http://www.blackgoogle.com/
then :-) Unfortunately, it seems like Xft uses Grayscale AA
(http://antigrain.com/research/font_rasterization/index.html)
so black background make the font look thinner.
-
| Oct 5, 3:32 pm 2007 |
| Lennart Sorensen | Re: [PATCH] Cute feature: colored printk output
I was mainly thinking someone with a server with a screen showing their
console might like to not make too much heat in the server room.
Google can be solved by simply closing the browser window. :)
--
Len Sorensen
-
| Oct 5, 3:43 pm 2007 |
| Jan Engelhardt | Re: [PATCH] Cute feature: colored printk output
"Ha, ok, I see where you're going with this one."
This patch is perfectly suited to reduce heat at home and in the server
room, especially during kernel development and debugging, but the
average kernel usage already pays off. Just add vt.printk_color=0x08
and all your kernel messages and oopses will be printed using low-power
electrons. Extremely useful on SGI Altix 4700, which does print a lot
(number of CPU cores), or SunFire X4500 (number of disks). Even if not
using one of these systems, C...
| Oct 5, 3:55 pm 2007 |
| Timur Tabi | __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
What's the difference between __LITTLE_ENDIAN and __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD?
Can someone give me an example when __BIG_ENDIAN and __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
would both be defined simultaneously?
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
-
| Oct 5, 2:27 pm 2007 |
| Jan Engelhardt | Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
standard x86:
---LSB-- ---2SB-- ---3SB-- ---MSB-- [bytes] LITTLE_ENDIAN
M765432L M765432L M765432L M765432L [bits] ?_BITFIELD
(Not sure what bitfield type, but I'd guess BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
standard sparc:
---MSB-- ---3SB-- ---2SB-- ---LSB-- [bytes] BIG_ENDIAN
M765432L M765432L M765432L M765432L [bits] ?_BITFIELD
(I hope I got these two right)
Theoretical machine with BIG_ENDIAN but LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD:
---MSB-- ---3SB-- ---2SB-- ---LSB--
L234567M L234567M L234567M L234567M
-
...
| Oct 5, 2:35 pm 2007 |
| Timur Tabi | Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
Are you sure? I would think that all machines would have the same byte and
bit endian, otherwise you'd never be able to put a 16-bit value into a shift
register. Your bits will be shifted out like this:
<-- 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 00 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 08
So I think x86 is:
---LSB-- ---2SB-- ---3SB-- ---MSB-- [bytes] LITTLE_ENDIAN
L234567M L234567M L234567M L234567M [bits] LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
-
| Oct 5, 3:35 pm 2007 |
| Anton Altaparmakov | Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
No it is not. That makes no sense. The whole point of little endian
is that you store LSB, then 2SB, then 3SB, then MSB and then when the
CPU reads this as a 32-bit word it rotates them all around so that in
the CPU register you have:
MSB_3SB_2SB_LSB
M765432L_M765432L_M765432L_M765432L
That is what little endian means and that is how shift operations can
work fine on the CPU.
Best regards,
Anton
--
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Suppo...
| Oct 5, 5:06 pm 2007 |
| Timur Tabi | Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
Why not? I honestly don't know what x86 does, but I would think that if I
write a 32-bit value to a memory location, that when I examine that memory
You're talking about byte endian. I'm talking about bit endian -- the order
of bits within a byte. Software cannot know what the bit endian is, but
The CPU shift operation, yes. I'm talking about shift operations on external
memory-mapped devices.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
-
| Oct 5, 5:10 pm 2007 |
| Andreas Schwab | Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
That is a property of how the device is wired to the bus. The cpu will
always put a value of 128 on the bus such that D7 = 1 and D0-D6 = 0.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
| Oct 5, 5:29 pm 2007 |
| Timur Tabi | Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
Yes, but is D7 on the left or on the right?
Anyway, this is academic now. I now know that __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD is not
what I want, and that there's no macro that will tell how the lines from the
CPU to external memory are mapped.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
-
| Oct 5, 5:32 pm 2007 |
| Andreas Schwab | Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
This is always the same.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
| Oct 5, 7:17 pm 2007 |
| Jan Engelhardt | Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
Bit representation is left to the CPU, so 1 << 1 will always be 2,
regardless of whether the byte, when sent out to the network,
is 01000000 or 00000010. Endianess becomes important as soon
as the packet is on the network, of course.
-
| Oct 5, 3:43 pm 2007 |
| Timur Tabi | Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
Well yes, that's why I'm asking. I'm not concerned about data from just the
CPU's perspective.
I'm writing a driver that talks to hardware that has a shift register. The
register can be shifted either left or right, so all the bits obviously have
to be in order, but it can be either order.
What I want to do is to have the driver detect when byte-endianness doesn't
match bit-endianness when it writes the the word to a memory-mapped device. I
think I can do that like this:
#if (defined...
| Oct 5, 3:47 pm 2007 |
| Andreas Schwab | Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
Bit addressing is strictly internal to the cpu, the smallest unit that
the cpu can address externally is a byte. The only place where bit
order matters on the C level is in a bitfield that is overlayed over a
The bit mapping on your device is strictly internal to the device and
has nothing to do with bit order on the C level.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B ...
| Oct 5, 4:04 pm 2007 |
| Timur Tabi | Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
Then I don't understand that point of defining __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD. What
does it mean for a C-level bitfield ordering to be little-endian if the
processor is BIG_ENDIAN?
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
-
| Oct 5, 4:07 pm 2007 |
| Andreas Schwab | Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
Byte endianess and bit endianness are orthogonal concecpts. A cpu can
have insns using both little and big endian bit addressing (btst
vs. bftst on m68k). The bitfield ordering is a property of the ABI and
may even be different from how the cpu numbers the bits in its ISA.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something c...
| Oct 5, 5:17 pm 2007 |
| linux-os (Dick Johnson) | Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
What does it mean for a C-level bitfield ordering to be little-endian if the
It makes no sense because a bitfield is something having to
do with a 'C' compiler and it must NEVER be used as a template
to address hardware! 'C' gives no guarantee of the ordering
within machine words. The only way you can access them is
using 'C'. They don't have addresses like other objects
(of course they do exist --somewhere). They are put into
"storage units," according to the standard, and these
storage un...
| Oct 5, 4:34 pm 2007 |
| Timur Tabi | Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
Well, if it doesn't make any sense why do we have __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD and
__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD? That is, why do we do this:
#if defined(__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
__u8 reserved1 : 2;
__u8 ili : 1;
__u8 reserved2 : 1;
__u8 sense_key : 4;
#elif defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
__u8 sense_key : 4;
__u8 reserved2 : 1;
__u8 ili : 1;
__u8 reserved1 : 2;
#endif
when we can just do this:
#if defined(__BIG_ENDIAN)
__u8 reserved1 : 2;
__u8 ili : 1;
__u8 reserved2 : ...
| Oct 5, 4:37 pm 2007 |
| Benjamin Herrenschmidt | Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
.../... (snipped horror use of bitfields)
Bitfields are wrong. Period. Don't use them.
__LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD vs. __BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD is Linux way to cope
with existing code using them that needs fixing on architectures that
have C bitfields in reverse order but that's not even something that can
be properly relied upon generally.
Just don't use bitfields and be happy.
Ben.
-
| Oct 5, 7:27 pm 2007 |
| Jeff Garzik | [git patch] net driver fix
Fix a rather large performance regression.
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus
to receive the following updates:
drivers/net/r8169.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Francois Romieu (1):
r8169: revert part of 6dccd16b7c2703e8bbf8bca62b5cf248332afbe2
diff --git a/drivers/net/r8169.c b/drivers/net/r8169.c
index c921ec3..c76dd29 100644
--- a/drivers/ne...
| Oct 5, 2:20 pm 2007 |
| Jeff Garzik | [git patches] net driver updates
Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-davem
to receive the following updates:
Auke Kok (2):
e1000e: fix debugging printout code
e1000e: Fix ethtool register test code
Frank Blaschka (1):
qeth: EDDP does not work on large MTUs
Klaus D. Wacker (2):
qeth: HiperSockets layer-3 interface drop non IPv4 or non IPv6 packets
lcs: Channel errors drive lcs_recovery which leads to kernel p...
| Oct 5, 2:20 pm 2007 |
| Manuel Lauss | 2.6.23-rc9-git4: pata_pcmcia, disabling IRQ #9
Hello,
Latest git, insert a CF card into cardbus slot gives:
pccard: PCMCIA card inserted into slot 0
cs: memory probe 0x0c0000-0x0fffff: excluding 0xc0000-0xcffff 0xe0000-0xfffff
cs: memory probe 0x60000000-0x60ffffff: clean.
cs: memory probe 0xa0000000-0xa0ffffff: clean.
cs: memory probe 0xdea00000-0xdeafffff: excluding 0xdea00000-0xdeafffff
cs: memory probe 0xff600000-0xff6fffff: excluding 0xff600000-0xff60ffff 0xff6a0000-0xff6dffff 0xff6f0000-0xff6fffff
pcmcia: registering new device pcmcia0...
| Oct 5, 2:08 pm 2007 |
| Erez Zadok | [PATCH] 0/3 checkpatch updates, new checkfiles script
This series of patches adds a -t option to checkpatch, so it can print terse
messages one per line, in a format compatible with g/cc
(filename:linenumber:message). This format can be parsed by various tools
and editors that can help show the errors in one window and the offending
file+line in another window.
This patch series also introduces a new small shell script wrapper, called
scripts/checkfiles, that checks the compliance of source files (not in diff
format); the script can operate on any ...
| Oct 5, 12:56 pm 2007 |
| Erez Zadok | [PATCH 3/3] CHECKFILES: new small shell script to check mult...
Examples:
./scripts/checkfiles fs/foo/bar.c
./scripts/checkfiles fs/foo/*.c
./scripts/checkfiles fs/foo # check all sources under fs/foo
./scripts/checkfiles . # check entire kernel
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
---
scripts/checkfiles | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 scripts/checkfiles
diff --git a/scripts/checkfiles b/scripts/checkfiles
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bd5d3f0
---...
| Oct 5, 12:56 pm 2007 |
| Erez Zadok | [PATCH 2/3] CHECKPATCH: add terse output option to checkpatc...
Such terse output complies with g/cc and looks like
file_name:line_number:error_message
This output can be easily parsed within text editors (e.g., emacs/vim) that
can produce a split text screen showing in one screen the error message, and
in another screen the corresponding source file, with the cursor placed on
the offending line.
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
...
| Oct 5, 12:56 pm 2007 |
| Erez Zadok | [PATCH 1/3] CHECKPATCH: update usage string for checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index dae7d30..ecbb030 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ if ($#ARGV < 0) {
print "version: $V\n";
print "options: -q => quiet\n";
print " --no-tree => run without a kernel tree\n";
+ print " --no-signoff => ...
| Oct 5, 12:56 pm 2007 |
| previous day | today | next day |
|---|---|---|
| October 4, 2007 | October 5, 2007 | October 6, 2007 |
| Parag Warudkar | BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0] |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
