To be consistent with the use of attributes in the rest of the kernel

replace all use of __attribute_pure__ with __pure and delete the

definition of __attribute_pure__.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
---

Patch against v2.6.23-rc8-mm2.
And btw why does Analog list half their employees in the MAINTAINERS entry?

Seems a little over the top ...
  Ralf
diff --git a/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpopcode.h b/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpopcode.h

index ec78e35..0090b19 100644

--- a/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpopcode.h

+++ b/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpopcode.h

@@ -369,20 +369,20 @@ TABLE 5

 #define getRoundingMode(opcode)		((opcode & MASK_ROUNDING_MODE) >> 5)
 #ifdef CONFIG_FPE_NWFPE_XP

-static inline __attribute_pure__ floatx80 getExtendedConstant(const unsigned int nIndex)

+static inline floatx80 __pure getExtendedConstant(const unsigned int nIndex)

 {

 	extern const floatx80 floatx80Constant[];

 	return floatx80Constant[nIndex];

 }

 #endif
-static inline __attribute_pure__ float64 getDoubleConstant(const unsigned int nIndex)

+static inline float64 __pure getDoubleConstant(const unsigned int nIndex)

 {

 	extern const float64 float64Constant[];

 	return float64Constant[nIndex];

 }
-static inline __attribute_pure__ float32 getSingleConstant(const unsigned int nIndex)

+static inline float32 __pure getSingleConstant(const unsigned int nIndex)

 {

 	extern const float32 float32Constant[];

 	return float32Constant[nIndex];

diff --git a/drivers/media/video/v4l1-compat.c b/drivers/media/video/v4l1-compat.c

index 9eac65f..dcf22a3 100644

--- a/drivers/media/video/v4l1-compat.c

+++ b/drivers/media/video/v4l1-compat.c

@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ const static unsigned int palette2pixelformat[] = {

 	[VIDEO_PALETTE_YUV422P] = V4L2_PIX_FMT_YUV422P,

 };
-static unsigned int __attribute_pure__

+static unsigned int __pure

 palette_to_pixelformat(unsigned int palette)

 {

 	if (palette < ARRAY_SIZE(palette2pixelformat))

diff --git a/include/asm-blackfin/processor.h b/include/asm-blackfin/pr...
[ message continues ]

Concern: __attribute_pure__ is very similar to __attribute_const__,

which is almost completely, but not totally unlike the keyword "const"...
	-hpa

-

Trimmed the CC list a bit
Yes, there's also the fact that __pure is a reserved GCC keyword.

Essentially according to GCC docs all of the GCC-specific keywords

are equivalently defined as "keyword", "__keyword", and

"__keyword__", with only the latter two defined in strict-ANSI mode.

The following is valid according to GCC docs:
static int __attribute__((__pure)) my_strlen(const char *str);
With the proposed definition of __pure, that becomes a noticeably

invalid __attribute__((__attribute__((__pure__))))
Cheers,

Kyle Moffett
-

Yeah, the original submission got a little carried away...
We can cut that down to just Bryan and the mailing list I think.
-Robin

-

doesnt matter one way or the other to me, so:
this is supposed to be replaced with just the mailing list

-mike

-

Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>
Cheers,

Mauro
-